Serum Total Bilirubin Levels Provide Additive Risk Information over the Framingham Risk Score for Identifying Asymptomatic Diabetic Patients at Higher Risk for Coronary Artery Stenosis

Article information

Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39(5):414-423
Publication date (electronic) : 2015 October 22
doi : https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2015.39.5.414
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Ki-Up Lee. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05506, Korea. kulee@amc.seoul.kr
Received 2014 August 27; Accepted 2014 November 24.

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is often delayed in patients with type 2 diabetes. Serum total bilirubin levels are inversely associated with CAD. However, no studies have examined whether this can be used as a biochemical marker for identifying asymptomatic diabetic patients at higher risk for having obstructive CAD.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study of 460 consecutive asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. All patients underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography, and their serum total bilirubin levels were measured. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis in at least one coronary artery.

Results

Serum total bilirubin tertiles showed an inverse association with the prevalence of obstructive CAD. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for the highest versus the lowest tertile of total bilirubin was 0.227 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.130 to 0.398), and an increment of 1 µmol/L in serum total bilirubin level was associated with a 14.6% decrease in obstructive CAD after adjustment for confounding variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) plus serum total bilirubin level was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.668 to 0.753), which is significantly greater than that of the FRS alone (P=0.0028).

Conclusion

Serum total bilirubin level is inversely associated with obstructive CAD and provides additive risk information over the FRS. Serum total bilirubin may be helpful for identifying asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes who are at higher risk for obstructive CAD.

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. The diagnosis of CAD is often delayed in patients with type 2 diabetes due to a lack of symptoms [1]. Thus, diabetic patients have more extensive CAD at the time of diagnosis and worse outcomes than nondiabetic subjects [23]. Indeed, the CAD mortality rate after the first myocardial infarction is two to four times higher in patients with diabetes than in those without [3]. Therefore, development of screening approaches for the early detection of CAD is warranted in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a rapidly evolving noninvasive method for evaluating CAD and is currently considered to be a reliable alternative to conventional coronary angiography [45]. However, radiation exposure, the use of iodinated contrast agents, and the high cost all limit its use as a screening tool for CAD in asymptomatic patients. Additionally, CCTA is currently not recommended for the routine diagnosis of CAD in asymptomatic patients with diabetes [6]. Thus, identifying the subgroup of patients who might benefit from CCTA could be important in clinical practice.

Bilirubin, the end product of heme catabolism, is derived primarily from circulating hemoglobin [7]. Although bilirubin has long been considered a waste product, it is currently recognized as a potent endogenous antioxidant. A growing number of epidemiological studies report a negative association between serum bilirubin levels and the prevalence of CAD [8910]. Recently, a large prospective study of primary care patients with no previous history of CAD demonstrated that the serum bilirubin level is an independent risk factor for CAD events and all-cause death [11]. Therefore, much attention has been focused on the potential role of serum bilirubin as a predictive or prognostic marker for CAD in clinical practice. However, the potential role of the serum bilirubin level in identifying patients with obstructive CAD has not been investigated in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Here, we used CCTA to examine whether serum total bilirubin levels are independently associated with coronary artery stenosis in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes and asked whether this biochemical marker may help to identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for obstructive CAD.

METHODS

Study population

Four hundred seventy-eight consecutive asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes who visited the diabetes clinic at the Asan Medical Center between October 2009 and December 2010 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent 64-slice dual-source multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for CCTA. The exclusion criteria were as follows: chest pain or angina-equivalent symptoms, as determined using the Rose angina questionnaire; abnormal findings on a resting electrocardiogram, including pathological Q waves, ischemic (≥1 mm depression) ST segments, deep negative T waves, or complete left bundle branch block; a previous history of myocardial infarction/angina or percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting; ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmia; an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2; and a previous history of allergies to iodinated contrast agents. This study was originally designed to identify potential risk factors for obstructive CAD in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. An initial evaluation of this population is published elsewhere [12]. For the present analysis, 18 patients with chronic liver disease were also excluded: 16 with positive hepatitis B surface antigen and 2 with positive hepatitis C antibodies. Therefore, a total of 460 patients were included in the final analysis. All patients provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center.

Clinical and biochemical assessment

Basic demographic data were obtained through personal interviews. All patients were asked about their history of angina, myocardial infarction, revascularization, concomitant noncardiac comorbidities, age at diagnosis of diabetes, smoking and drinking habits, and current medication profiles. The data were confirmed by a review of their medical records. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to the Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus [13]. Hypertension was defined as a blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or the use of antihypertensive medications. Smoking habits were defined as smoking currently or having stopped smoking within 1 year of the interview.

The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square root of the height in meters. Blood pressure was measured on the right arm after a ≥5-minute rest using an automatic manometer fitted with an appropriate size cuff. Blood samples were obtained after a fast of at least 12 hours. Serum total bilirubin levels were measured by the vanadate oxidation method using the Toshiba 200FR (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). The levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and triglycerides were determined by an enzymatic colorimetric method using the Toshiba 200FR. The serum creatinine levels were measured by the quantitative capillary photometry method using the TEST 1 automated analyzer (Alifax SpA, Polverara, Italy). The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were determined by ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography using the Variant II automated analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The eGFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation [14]. A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded on the same day that the 64-slice dual-source MDCT was performed. The presence of diabetic retinopathy was assessed using retinal photography performed with a wide-angle camera and scored centrally by an experienced ophthalmologist. The extent of albuminuria was determined from the albumin-creatinine ratio in a random spot urine collection. The presence of diabetic nephropathy was defined as microalbuminuria (30 to 300 µg albumin/mg creatinine) or overt albuminuria (>300 µg albumin/mg creatinine) in the absence of other conditions capable of causing proteinuria. The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for estimating the 10-year risk for coronary heart disease was calculated based on age, sex, total cholesterol and HDL-C levels, blood pressure, smoking status, and history of diabetes [15].

Evaluation of coronary stenosis and plaque morphology

For all eligible patients, coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements were followed immediately by CCTA using a 64-slice dual-source MDCT scanner (Somatom Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Patients with baseline heart rates >85 beats per minute were given oral β-blockers before CCTA imaging. Each patient was also given 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin sublingually 1 minute before image acquisition. A standard scanning protocol was applied with 2×32×0.6 mm collimation, 64-slice acquisition per rotation, 330 ms rotation time, 100 to 120 kVp tube voltage, and 250 to 380 mAs/rot tube current according to the patient's body habitus. All scans were performed using electrocardiogram-gated dose modulation. A bolus of 60 to 80 mL of iomeprol (Iomeron 400; Bracco, Milan, Italy) was intravenously injected (4 to 5 mL/sec), followed by 50 mL of saline chaser. A region of interest was located in the ascending aorta, and image acquisition was automatically initiated once a selected threshold (120 Hounsfield units [HU]) had been reached with bolus tracking. Each patient's electrocardiogram was simultaneously recorded to allow for retrospective segmental data reconstruction. The images were initially reconstructed at the mid-diastolic phase (75% of the R-R interval) of the cardiac cycle.

All scans were analyzed on a 3-dimensional workstation (Syngo Workstation; Siemens Medical Solutions). An experienced radiologist who was blinded to the patients' clinical information calculated the CAC scores according to the Agatston method [16]. All coronary computed tomography angiograms were interpreted by two experienced radiologists who were blinded to the patients' clinical information and CAC scores and who reached a decision by consensus. Each lesion was identified using a multiplanar reconstruction technique and the maximum intensity projection of short-axis, two-chamber, and four-chamber views. Coronary artery stenosis and plaque characteristics were analyzed on a per-segment basis according to the classification of the American Heart Association criteria [17]. The contrast-enhanced portion of the coronary lumen was semi-automatically traced at the maximal stenotic site and compared with the mean values for the proximal and distal reference sites. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis in at least one coronary artery. Plaques were defined as structures >1 mm2 within and/or adjacent to the vessel lumen. Plaques consisting of calcified tissue occupying more than 50% of the plaque area (density >130 HU in native scans) were classified as calcified plaques, plaques with <50% calcium were classified as mixed plaques, and plaques without any calcium were classified as noncalcified plaques.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables showing a normal distribution are expressed as the mean±standard deviation, continuous variables showing a skewed distribution are expressed as the median (and interquartile range), and categorical variables are expressed as percentages (%). The study population was divided into the following tertiles according to serum total bilirubin levels: T1 (<12 µmol/L), T2 (12 to 17 µmol/L), and T3 (>17 µmol/L). The clinical and biochemical characteristics according to the tertiles of serum total bilirubin levels were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and the chi-square trend test for categorical variables. The presence of any plaque subtype (calcified, mixed, or noncalcified) was analyzed on a per-patient basis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios of serum total bilirubin level as a group or continuous variable to predict the presence of obstructive CAD, a CAC score ≥400, or different plaque subtypes. To compare the abilities of the FRS plus serum total bilirubin level and FRS alone to predict obstructive CAD, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated. MedCalc version 11.6.1.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used to compare AUC values. All other statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population according to serum total bilirubin tertiles

The study population was composed of 460 asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of CAD (age, 63.0±8.3 years; duration of diabetes, 13.3±7.9 years; 62% male). A longer duration of diabetes (P<0.001), higher systolic blood pressure (P=0.040), current smoking (P=0.012), diabetic retinopathy (P=0.001), diabetic nephropathy (P<0.001), lower level of HDL-C (P=0.017), higher level of triglycerides (P=0.045), lower eGFR (P=0.015), and higher FRS (P=0.002) were each significantly associated with lower total bilirubin tertiles (Table 1). The prevalence of hypertension tended to decrease across the total bilirubin tertiles; however, the statistical significance was marginal (P=0.068). There were no significant differences in age, male gender, BMI, diastolic blood pressure, levels of HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL-C, AST, and ALT, current use of insulin and statins, or alcohol consumption among the groups.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population according to serum total bilirubin tertiles

Prevalence of obstructive CAD and coronary plaque subtypes according to serum total bilirubin tertiles

Among the 460 patients, 333 had some form of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and 178 had obstructive (>50% luminal narrowing) CAD (Table 2). The prevalence of patients with obstructive CAD significantly decreased across the total bilirubin tertiles (T1, 64%; T2, 32%; T3, 20%; P<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in the extent of CAD, defined by the number of stenosed vessels, across the tertiles (P<0.001). A lower total bilirubin tertile was significantly associated with a higher CAC score (P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a CAC score ≥400 showed a negative relationship with the tertile (T1, 30%; T2, 16%; T3, 3%; P<0.001). In addition, a higher total bilirubin tertile was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of any (T1, 84%; T2, 69%; T3, 63%; P<0.001), calcified (T1, 63%; T2, 55%; T3, 48%; P=0.009), mixed (T1, 35%; T2, 23%; T3, 16%; P<0.001), or noncalcified (T1, 49%; T2, 34%; T3, 28%; P<0.001) plaques.

Analysis of coronary computed tomographic angiography

Risk for obstructive CAD according to serum total bilirubin level

As shown in Table 3, the odds ratios for obstructive CAD consistently showed an increasing trend across the total bilirubin tertiles. Serum total bilirubin level as a continuous variable was also inversely associated with the prevalence of obstructive CAD. Serum total bilirubin level, as both a categorical and a continuous variable, showed an independent negative relationship with obstructive CAD after adjusting for age, gender, duration of diabetes, prevalence of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and current smoking (model 1). These associations remained significant even after adjusting for BMI, HbA1c, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (model 2). Further adjustment for the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, eGFR, current use of insulin and statins, AST, ALT, and alcohol intake did not significantly affect the results (model 3). In multivariate logistic regression model 3, the odds ratio for the highest versus the lowest tertile of total bilirubin was 0.227 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.130 to 0.398), and an increment of 1 µmol/L in serum total bilirubin level was associated with a 14.6% reduction in the incidence of obstructive CAD.

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for obstructive coronary artery disease according to serum total bilirubin level as a categorical or continuous variable after adjustments for confounding variab

Risk associated with a CAC score ≥400 and with each plaque subtype according to serum total bilirubin level

As a function of the serum total bilirubin level, the odds ratio for a CAC score ≥400 was 0.718 (95% CI, 0.641 to 0.804; P<0.001) after full adjustment (Table 4). An elevated serum total bilirubin level also appeared to show an independent negative relationship with the presence of a calcified plaque but did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.901 to 1.011; P=0.114). In addition, the odds ratio for the presence of mixed and noncalcified plaques was 0.886 (95% CI, 0.829 to 0.948; P<0.001) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.867 to 0.969; P=0.002) after full adjustment, respectively (Table 4).

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for the presence of coronary artery calcium score ≥400 and calcified, mixed, or noncalcified plaques according to serum total bilirubin level as a continuous variable after adjustments for confounding variables

Comparison of the predictive ability of the FRS alone and FRS plus serum total bilirubin level

ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC for FRS plus serum total bilirubin level was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.668 to 0.753), which was significantly greater than that of the FRS alone (AUC, 0.654; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.698; P=0.0028) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the ability of the Framingham risk score (FRS) alone or the FRS plus serum total bilirubin level to predict obstructive coronary artery disease. The area under the curve for the FRS plus serum total bilirubin level was 0.712 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.668 to 0.753), significantly greater than that of the FRS alone (area under the curve, 0.654; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.698). P=0.0028 for the comparison between the two areas.

DISCUSSION

Here, we examined whether serum total bilirubin levels can be used as a marker for identifying subjects with obstructive CAD among asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. We found that serum total bilirubin tertiles were inversely associated with the prevalence of obstructive CAD as assessed by CCTA and that serum total bilirubin levels provided additional risk information over the FRS.

Accumulating evidence has shown that serum bilirubin levels are negatively associated with a prevalence of various diseases [10]. Indeed, serum bilirubin makes the largest contribution to total antioxidant capacity within the circulation [7]. Thus, serum bilirubin may be an important protective factor against oxidative damage, preventing the development and progression of oxidative stress-mediated diseases such as CAD. Indeed, several animal studies have shown that bilirubin treatment protects against vascular complications [1819]. Oxidative stress also plays a major role in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its associated complications [20]. A recent Japanese population-based study showed that the serum bilirubin level is inversely associated with the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy [21]. Fukui et al. [22] also reported a negative correlation between serum bilirubin levels and microalbuminuria and arterial stiffness. Furthermore, accumulating evidence consistently shows that lower serum bilirubin levels are associated with a higher risk of CAD [891011]. However, most of these studies were performed using subjects without diabetes, and it has not been verified whether serum bilirubin can serve as a useful biochemical marker for identifying asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes at higher risk for obstructive CAD. The cohort examined in the present study was composed exclusively of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. The results showed that serum bilirubin levels are negatively associated with obstructive CAD in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Oxidative stress plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [23]. Specifically, lipid oxidation enhances foam cell formation through oxidized LDL formation and uptake. Importantly, serum bilirubin prevents LDL oxidation more efficiently than other endogenous antioxidants [24]. Therefore, serum bilirubin may protect against atherosclerosis by preventing LDL oxidation. On the other hand, there was no association between serum bilirubin level and LDL-C level, suggesting that bilirubin's protective effect is not due to the lowering of the LDL-C level.

It is suggested that the presence and extent of calcified plaques in coronary arteries are independently associated with CAD events and that taking this into account can increase the predictive power of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic diabetic patients [25]. On the other hand, mixed or noncalcified plaques are thought to be more vulnerable to rupture, which can result in an acute coronary event [26]. Recently, Canpolat et al. reported on the association of serum total bilirubin levels and plaque morphology in Turkish patients suspected to have CAD [27]. They found that serum total bilirubin levels were inversely associated with the presence and extent of noncalcified plaques but not calcified and mixed plaques. By contrast, a recent cross-sectional studies conducted in a Korean population reported that serum total bilirubin level was inversely associated with the presence of calcified plaques [28]. Here, we found a significant and inverse relationship between serum total bilirubin levels and the presence of mixed or noncalcified plaques. In addition, the serum total bilirubin levels were negatively associated with a CAC score ≥400 but not the presence of calcified plaques. The discrepancy between our study and the previously mentioned studies may be explained by differences in the study populations, including ethnicity and the presence/absence of diabetes or CAD symptoms.

Assessing the risk for CAD in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes is an important challenge for clinicians. In 1998, the American Diabetes Association recommended CAD screening for diabetic patients with multiple CAD risk factors [29]. However, subsequent studies demonstrated that an approach guided by the number of CAD risk factors is not successful for the early detection of CAD in diabetic patients because patients with fewer risk factors frequently present with CAD [30]. In addition, when applied to CAD risk assessments in asymptomatic diabetic patients, the effectiveness of predictive models such as the FRS is modest [31]. The present study shows that the serum total bilirubin levels provide additive risk information over the FRS and that this may help to identify asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes at higher risk for having obstructive CAD.

This study has several limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of this study did not allow a causal relationship to be determined. Second, this study was performed at a single university hospital in Korea. There are considerable ethnic genetic differences in bilirubin metabolism between Asian and Caucasian populations [32]. Therefore, our results may not be applicable to other ethnic groups. Third, an elevated serum total bilirubin level indicates liver damage, and it may therefore be significantly affected by underlying liver diseases. Here, we excluded patients with known chronic liver diseases. In addition, we adjusted the results of liver function tests such as AST and ALT to rule out the residual confounding effect of unrecognized underlying diseases. Fourth, in several cross-sectional studies, serum total bilirubin level was found to be negatively associated with the prevalence of ischemic stroke or peripheral arterial disease [3334]. We cannot exclude the possibility that such underlying conditions affected our analysis in evaluating the relationship between serum total bilirubin level and CAD because they were not included in our exclusion criteria and the information about them was not collected carefully. Finally, serum direct and indirect bilirubin levels seem to be different in their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities [35]. A recent study reported that direct bilirubin levels are positively correlated with CAD severity assessed by the Gensini score, whereas there is no association between total bilirubin levels and CAD severity [36]. In the present study, we did not measure serum direct bilirubin levels. Future studies are required for evaluating the relationship between serum direct bilirubin level and CAD.

Our findings suggest that serum total bilirubin levels are negatively associated with obstructive CAD among asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, serum total bilirubin levels provide risk information additional to that provided by the FRS. Serum bilirubin assays are inexpensive and widely available. Therefore, the serum total bilirubin may be helpful for identifying asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk for having obstructive CAD and who require more aggressive screening using CCTA.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2006-2005412 and 2009-0091988: K.U.L.).

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Jouven X, Lemaitre RN, Rea TD, Sotoodehnia N, Empana JP, Siscovick DS. Diabetes, glucose level, and risk of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2142–2147. 15980034.
2. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, van Werkhoven JM, Nucifora G, Decramer I, Sarno G, Vanhoenacker PK, Reiber JH, Wijns W, Bax JJ. Type 2 diabetes is associated with more advanced coronary atherosclerosis on multislice computed tomography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:376–383. 19437085.
3. Miettinen H, Lehto S, Salomaa V, Mahonen M, Niemela M, Haffner SM, Pyorala K, Tuomilehto J. Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction. The FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study Group. Diabetes Care 1998;21:69–75. 9538972.
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724–1732. 19007693.
5. Moon JS, Yoon JS, Won KC, Cho IH, Lee HW. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab J 2013;37:54–62. 23439730.
6. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O'Gara P, Rubin GD, Kramer CM, Berman D, Brown A, Chaudhry FA, Cury RC, Desai MY, Einstein AJ, Gomes AS, Harrington R, Hoffmann U, Khare R, Lesser J, McGann C, Rosenberg A, Schwartz R, Shelton M, Smetana GW, Smith SC Jr. American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. American College of Radiology. American Heart Association. American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1864–1894. 21087721.
7. Vitek L. The role of bilirubin in diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular diseases. Front Pharmacol 2012;3:55. 22493581.
8. Schwertner HA, Jackson WG, Tolan G. Association of low serum concentration of bilirubin with increased risk of coronary artery disease. Clin Chem 1994;40:18–23. 8287538.
9. Djousse L, Levy D, Cupples LA, Evans JC, D'Agostino RB, Ellison RC. Total serum bilirubin and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Framingham offspring study. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1196–1200. 11356398.
10. Novotny L, Vitek L. Inverse relationship between serum bilirubin and atherosclerosis in men: a meta-analysis of published studies. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2003;228:568–571. 12709588.
11. Horsfall LJ, Nazareth I, Petersen I. Cardiovascular events as a function of serum bilirubin levels in a large, statin-treated cohort. Circulation 2012;126:2556–2564. 23110860.
12. Leem J, Hee Koh E, Jeong E, Jang JE, Lee SW, Kang JW, Lim TH, Lee WJ, Kim MS, Park JY, Lee KU. Prevalence of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes according to the coronary calcium score. Intern Med 2012;51:3017–3023. 23124143.
13. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5–S20. 12502614.
14. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van Lente F. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:247–254. 16908915.
15. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837–1847. 9603539.
16. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827–832. 2407762.
17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5–40. 1116248.
18. Ollinger R, Yamashita K, Bilban M, Erat A, Kogler P, Thomas M, Csizmadia E, Usheva A, Margreiter R, Bach FH. Bilirubin and biliverdin treatment of atherosclerotic diseases. Cell Cycle 2007;6:39–43. 17245120.
19. Boon AC, Bulmer AC, Coombes JS, Fassett RG. Circulating bilirubin and defense against kidney disease and cardiovascular mortality: mechanisms contributing to protection in clinical investigations. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014;307:F123–F136. 24761005.
20. Sasaki S, Inoguchi T. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes Metab J 2012;36:255–261. 22950054.
21. Yasuda M, Kiyohara Y, Wang JJ, Arakawa S, Yonemoto K, Doi Y, Ninomiya T, Ishibashi T. High serum bilirubin levels and diabetic retinopathy: the Hisayama Study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1423–1428. 21600659.
22. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Shiraishi E, Harusato I, Hosoda H, Asano M, Hasegawa G, Nakamura N. Relationship between serum bilirubin and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int 2008;74:1197–1201. 18854849.
23. Stocker R, Keaney JF Jr. Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol Rev 2004;84:1381–1478. 15383655.
24. Sedlak TW, Saleh M, Higginson DS, Paul BD, Juluri KR, Snyder SH. Bilirubin and glutathione have complementary antioxidant and cytoprotective roles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:5171–5176. 19286972.
25. Elkeles RS, Godsland IF, Feher MD, Rubens MB, Roughton M, Nugara F, Humphries SE, Richmond W, Flather MD. PREDICT Study Group. Coronary calcium measurement improves prediction of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: the PREDICT study. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2244–2251. 18573867.
26. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Sarno G, Vanhoenacker PK, Boersma E, Reiber JH, Schalij MJ, Wijns W, Bax JJ. Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: noninvasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2373–2381. 18682447.
27. Canpolat U, Aytemir K, Yorgun H, Hazirolan T, Kaya EB, Sahiner L, Sunman H, Tokgozoglu L, Kabakci G, Oto A. Association of serum total bilirubin levels with the severity, extent and subtypes of coronary atherosclerotic plaques detected by coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1371–1379. 23546648.
28. Kang SJ, Kim D, Park HE, Chung GE, Choi SH, Choi SY, Lee W, Kim JS, Cho SH. Elevated serum bilirubin levels are inversely associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2013;230:242–248. 24075751.
29. Consensus development conference on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease in people with diabetes: 10-11 February 1998, Miami, Florida. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1551–1559. 9727908.
30. Scognamiglio R, Negut C, Ramondo A, Tiengo A, Avogaro A. Detection of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:65–71. 16386666.
31. Guzder RN, Gatling W, Mullee MA, Mehta RL, Byrne CD. Prognostic value of the Framingham cardiovascular risk equation and the UKPDS risk engine for coronary heart disease in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: results from a United Kingdom study. Diabet Med 2005;22:554–562. 15842509.
32. Kang TW, Kim HJ, Ju H, Kim JH, Jeon YJ, Lee HC, Kim KK, Kim JW, Lee S, Kim JY, Kim SY, Kim YS. Genome-wide association of serum bilirubin levels in Korean population. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:3672–3678. 20639394.
33. Perlstein TS, Pande RL, Creager MA, Weuve J, Beckman JA. Serum total bilirubin level, prevalent stroke, and stroke outcomes: NHANES 1999-2004. Am J Med 2008;121:781–788. 18724968.
34. Perlstein TS, Pande RL, Beckman JA, Creager MA. Serum total bilirubin level and prevalent lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2004. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:166–172. 17975120.
35. Wu TW, Fung KP, Wu J, Yang CC, Weisel RD. Antioxidation of human low density lipoprotein by unconjugated and conjugated bilirubins. Biochem Pharmacol 1996;51:859–862. 8602883.
36. Erkan A, Ekici B, Ugurlu M, Is G, Seker R, Demirtas S, Korkmaz S. The role of bilirubin and its protective function against coronary heart disease. Herz 2014;39:711–715. 23861132.

Article information Continued

Funded by : National Research Foundation of Korea
Award ID : 2006-2005412
Award ID : 2009-0091988

Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the ability of the Framingham risk score (FRS) alone or the FRS plus serum total bilirubin level to predict obstructive coronary artery disease. The area under the curve for the FRS plus serum total bilirubin level was 0.712 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.668 to 0.753), significantly greater than that of the FRS alone (area under the curve, 0.654; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.698). P=0.0028 for the comparison between the two areas.

Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population according to serum total bilirubin tertiles

Variable Total bilirubin tertile P value
T1 (<12 µmol/L) T2 (12-17 µmol/L) T3 (>17 µmol/L)
Number 154 154 152
Age, yr 63.9±8.9 62.8±8.9 62.2±6.8 0.177
Male sex 95 (62) 93 (60) 98 (64) 0.617
Duration of diabetes, yr 15.2±8.4 13.4±7.8 11.4±7.2 <0.001
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.8±2.8 25.0±3.3 25.4±3.0 0.236
Hypertension 93 (60) 80 (52) 76 (50) 0.068
SBP, mm Hg 135.5±16.7 131.5±14.8 131.7±15.0 0.04
DBP, mm Hg 78.1±8.8 77.6±8.5 78.3±9.3 0.777
Current smoking 46 (30) 33 (21) 27 (18) 0.012
HbA1c, % 57 (50-68) 56 (46-69) 56 (49-67) 0.568
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.5±0.9 4.6±0.9 4.5±0.9 0.67
LDL-C, mmol/L 2.8±0.8 2.9±0.8 2.8±0.8 0.317
HDL-C, mmol/L 1.2±0.3 1.3±0.3 1.3±0.3 0.017
Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.5 (1.1-2.0) 1.3 (1.0-1.9) 1.3 (1.0-1.6) 0.045
Diabetic retinopathy 73 (47) 56 (36) 45 (30) 0.001
Diabetic nephropathy 50 (33) 28 (18) 19 (13) <0.001
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 79.0±16.5 81.0±15.7 84.2±15.0 0.015
Insulin use 32 (21) 25 (16) 22 (14) 0.144
Statin use 35 (23) 38 (25) 33 (22) 0.835
AST, IU/L 23.4±8.0 24.8±10.1 24.6±9.1 0.381
ALT, IU/L 23.1±9.8 23.2±10.6 25.0±12.7 0.229
Alcohol intake, g/day 0.538
 <5 107 (69) 111 (72) 102 (67)
 5-30 35 (23) 34 (22) 35 (23)
 >30 12 (8) 9 (6) 15 (10)
Framingham 10-year risk, % 17.8±8.2 15.6±7.4 14.7±7.3 0.002

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

Table 2

Analysis of coronary computed tomographic angiography

Variable Total bilirubin tertile P value
T1 (n=154) T2 (n=154) T3 (n=152)
Obstructive coronary artery disease 98 (64) 49 (32) 31 (20) <0.001
No. of stenosed <0.001
 1-Vessel disease 39 (25) 28 (18) 10 (7)
 2-Vessel disease 30 (19) 11 (7) 10 (7)
 3-Vessel disease 29 (19) 9 (6) 4 (3)
Coronary artery calcium score 129 (0-519) 26 (0-145) 7 (0-100) <0.001
Coronary artery calcium score ≥400 46 (30) 24 (16) 5 (3) <0.001
Plaques (per patient)
 Any plaque 130 (84) 107 (69) 96 (63) <0.001
 Calcified plaque 97 (63) 84 (55) 73 (48) 0.009
 Mixed plaque 54 (35) 35 (23) 25 (16) <0.001
 Noncalcified plaque 76 (49) 53 (34) 42 (28) <0.001

Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).

Table 3

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for obstructive coronary artery disease according to serum total bilirubin level as a categorical or continuous variable after adjustments for confounding variab

Variable T1 (n=154) T2 (n=154) T3 (n=152) P value
Tertiles of serum total bilirubin
 Unadjusted 1 0.489 (0.310-0.771) 0.210 (0.126-0.350) <0.001
 Model 1 1 0.531 (0.331-0.851) 0.222 (0.130-0.379) <0.001
 Model 2 1 0.530 (0.327-0.858) 0.224 (0.130-0.388) <0.001
 Model 3 1 0.529 (0.324-0.865) 0.227 (0.130-0.398) <0.001
Serum total bilirubin (µmol/L)
 Unadjusted 0.854 (0.808-0.903) <0.001
 Model 1 0.859 (0.811-0.909) <0.001
 Model 2 0.862 (0.812-0.914) <0.001
 Model 3 0.864 (0.814-0.918) <0.001

Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, duration of diabetes, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and current smoking. Model 2: adjusted for all of the variables in model 1 plus body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Model 3: adjusted for all of the variables in model 2 plus diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, current use of insulin and a statin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alcohol intake.

Table 4

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for the presence of coronary artery calcium score ≥400 and calcified, mixed, or noncalcified plaques according to serum total bilirubin level as a continuous variable after adjustments for confounding variables

Variable Serum total bilirubin (µmol/L) P value
CAC score ≥400
 Unadjusted 0.771 (0.707-0.842) <0.001
 Model 1 0.761 (0.690-0.840) <0.001
 Model 2 0.735 (0.661-0.817) <0.001
 Model 3 0.718 (0.641-0.804) <0.001
Calcified plaque
 Unadjusted 0.943 (0.900-0.988) 0.014
 Model 1 0.957 (0.908-1.010) 0.108
 Model 2 0.952 (0.901-1.007) 0.086
 Model 3 0.955 (0.901-1.011) 0.114
Mixed plaque
 Unadjusted 0.880 (0.828-0.935) <0.001
 Model 1 0.878 (0.825-0.936) <0.001
 Model 2 0.887 (0.832-0.947) <0.001
 Model 3 0.886 (0.829-0.948) <0.001
Noncalcified plaque
 Unadjusted 0.902 (0.857-0.950) <0.001
 Model 1 0.911 (0.864-0.961) 0.001
 Model 2 0.917 (0.869-0.969) 0.002
 Model 3 0.916 (0.867-0.969) 0.002

Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, duration of diabetes, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and current smoking. Model 2: adjusted for all of the variables in model 1 plus body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Model 3: adjusted for all of the variables in model 2 plus diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, current use of insulin and statin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alcohol intake.