Diabetes Promotes Myocardial Fibrosis via AMPK/EZH2/PPAR-γ Signaling Pathway (<i>Diabetes Metab J</i> 2024;48:716-29)
Article information
We sincerely appreciate the thoughtful comments by Dr. Lee and Dr. Moon on our recently published article, “Diabetes promotes myocardial fibrosis via AMPK/EZH2/PPAR-γ signaling pathway” [1]. Your insights have enriched the discussion, particularly regarding the complex interplay between AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) signaling pathways, and the implications for therapeutic strategies in diabetic heart failure. We also would like to thank the editor for the chance to further discuss our article.
Dr. Lee and Dr. Moon raised several important points that warrant further elaboration. First, the cardioprotective effects of metformin, a well-known AMPK activator, is highly relevant. Indeed, as they noted, metformin has demonstrated multiple beneficial effects in improving diabetic heart failure outcomes, including mortality and hospitalization rates [2]. The parallel between metformin’s inhibition of the transforming growth factor-β1-Smad3 pathway and our findings regarding AMPK-mediated EZH2 regulation of PPAR-γ signaling highlights a potential shared mechanism [3]. We agree that further investigation into how metformin influences EZH2 and histone methylation in the context of cardiac fibrosis could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its protective effects in diabetic heart failure. This is an avenue we are actively considering for future studies.
Your second concern regarding the dual-edged effects of PPAR-γ activation is equally important. While rosiglitazone and pioglitazone have shown promise in attenuating cardiac fibrosis, the fluid retention and heart failure risks associated with thiazolidinediones are well-documented [4,5]. Their observation underscores the need for cautious evaluation of PPAR-γ agonists, especially in light of their known effects on sodium reabsorption and peripheral edema. We agree that the potential for novel PPAR-γ agonists, or possibly co-agonists/antagonists targeting additional molecular pathways, could offer a more favorable balance between anti-fibrotic effects and the risk of exacerbating heart failure. Future research should focus on identifying PPAR-γ-targeting therapies that minimize adverse outcomes while improving cardiac function in diabetic patients.
Finally, we also agree that EZH2 inhibitors and their emerging potential in metabolic diseases provides an exciting avenue for exploration. While EZH2 inhibitors like GSK126 have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiac fibrosis in our study, their broader potential in metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, as well as their established role in oncology, highlights the versatility of histone methylation modulators. The promising effects of dual EZH1/2 inhibitors in cancer treatment suggest that EZH2-targeted therapies could be similarly beneficial in the context of diabetic heart failure. However, the safety and efficacy of these inhibitors in non-oncological diseases must be thoroughly evaluated.
In conclusion, we appreciate the valuable comments on our study. The roles of metformin, PPAR-γ activation, and EZH2 inhibitors in diabetic heart failure open new avenues for future investigation. We agree that a more nuanced approach, considering both the benefits and risks of these therapies, is essential for optimizing outcomes in diabetic heart failure patients. We look forward to further studies that explore these mechanisms and potential therapies in greater depth.
Thank you once again for your insightful comments.
Notes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.