Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Diabetes Metab J > Volume 31(5); 2007 > Article
Original Article Antibodies to GAD and ICA in Type 2 DM with Secondary Failure of Oral Hypoglycemic Therapy.
Jung Hyun Oh, Ji Sung Yoon, Kyu Chang Won, Hyoung Woo Lee
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2007;31(5):402-409
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/jkda.2007.31.5.402
Published online: September 1, 2007
  • 2,062 Views
  • 17 Download
  • 5 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University.

BACKGROUND
Secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents is defined as that blood glucose is no longer controlled with sulfonylurea after a proven period of good glycemic control. There are many causes of secondary failure, including that drug problem, acute illnesses, inappropriate drug dosages, oxidative stress & glucose toxicity of beta-cell, etc. And many studies have suggested role of immunologic process such as islet cell antibody (ICA) and/or glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) for the causes of secondary failure. So we evaluated the prevalence of ICA & GADA in type 2 diabetes with secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents and the pathogenesis of the secondary failure. METHODS: We studied 267 patients with type 2 diabetes. We regarded 84 patients who could not control HbA1c less than 8% after good glycemic control for at least 1 year as secondary failure group (group 1) and regarded the other 183 patients as group 2. We measured GADA in both group, and measured the prevalence of GADA and ICA in secondary failure group who were especially divided into obese group and nonobese group according to BMI and were divided into insulin deficiency group and noninsulin deficiency group according to fasting C-peptide level. RESULTS: The prevalence of GADA in all subjects was 4.1%, which was 9.5% in group 1 and 1.6% in group 2 (P < 0.05). Among 35 patients of the group 1 who could be checked ICA, the prevalence of GADA & ICA were 33% & 25% in insulin deficiency group and 4.3% & 0% in non-insulin deficiency group, respectively (P < 0.05). The prevalence of GADA & ICA were none in obese group and 33.3% & 20% in nonobese group, respectively (P < 0.05). The prevalence of GADA & ICA were 36.4% & 27.3% in nonobese and insulin deficiency, 4.2% & 0% in obese and non-insulin deficiency. CONCLUSION: We suggest that autoimmune mechanism is associated with increased risk for secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes, so the measurement of GADA and ICA could help to predict the potential risk and insulin treatment.

  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Antibodies to GAD and ICA in Type 2 DM with Secondary Failure of Oral Hypoglycemic Therapy.
    Korean Diabetes J. 2007;31(5):402-409.   Published online September 1, 2007
    Close
Related articles

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal