INTRODUCTION

The majority of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients are obese, and the risk of developing diabetes is affected by body weight gain [1,2]. For such reasons, the American Diabetes Association recommends a decrease in the body weight of obese diabetes patients or people who are at risk for diabetes [3].

The increasing prevalence of obesity is paralleled by increasing portion sizes. It has been shown in several experimental trials that portion size is an important factor in total energy intake [4]. Rolls et al. [5] reported that when serving sizes are doubled, total energy intake increased even more. Pedersen et al. [6] gave obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients a controlled diet using partitioned plates, divided for carbohydrates, protein, cheese and sauce sections. The plate group education lost more body weight than a group receiving general diabetes regulation, and it was reported that the effective dosage of oral anti-diabetic agents could also be decreased. For this reason, one of the methods for decreasing the body weight of obese individuals is reducing serving size. Some organizations recommend using smaller plates in order to decrease the size of the portions to reduce total energy intake [7]. Rolls et al. [8] applied varying plate sizes, and when similar menus were available, the use of smaller plates decreased the total energy intake; however, it was reported that this method was ineffective.

According to the 2005 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [9], 70% of total energy intake in Korean women with diabetes is consumed as carbohydrates. Such results show that Korean women with diabetes consume high-carbohydrate diets. It was reported that the primary dietary source of carbohydrates was rice [9]. We reported that among diabetes patients who eat three meals per day, 96.4% of them consume over two meals of rice per day [10], which suggests that the proportion of rice per meal in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus patients is very high.

In this study, the median size of the rice bowl used by diabetes patients was 350 mL and the size of the rice bowl correlated with the intake of energy intake from rice [10]. In previous study [11], a 200 mL rice bowl was effective at reducing total energy intake and carbohydrate intake after a two week period in overweight and obese patients. However, because this result was just compared before and after intervention, it was difficult to determine the effect of bowl size on total energy intake and carbohydrate intake, especially considering that the short study duration (2 weeks) limited the observable body weight loss.

In the present study, obese Korean women with type 2 diabetes mellitus consumed rice as a staple food. We have attempted to determine if rice bowl size has any effect on total energy intake, carbohydrate intake, body weight, and blood glucose levels. We also observed whether the rice bowls 50% smaller than regular rice bowl had any metabolic effect.

METHODS

Subjects

Subjects were female type 2 diabetic patients who visited the Eulji Hospital diabetes outpatient clinic between September 2007 and November 2008. They were informed about the purpose and procedures involved in this study and all agreed to participate. At the conclusion of the 12-week intervention period, a total of 42 patients were analyzed. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in this study followed the diagnostic standards established by the American Diabetes Association in 1997. Participants in this study were between the ages of 20 and 70, had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23 kg/m², and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between 6.0% and 10%.

The following conditions were cause for exclusion from this study: patients treated with insulin or thiazolidinedione medications, patients who consumed more than one alcoholic beverage per day, patients who ate out more than twice per week, patients with special diets (e.g., vegetarians), patients who were unable to exercise, patients with indigestion, anorexia, gestational diabetes, malignant tumors, cardiovascular disease, patients who had consumed body weight loss drugs in the last three months, patients who were difficult to follow, and patients who refused investigation.

Method

After the subjects enrolled, they were divided into small rice bowl group, regular rice bowl group, or control group, with the random number table. Four weeks of screening period was followed by 12 weeks' intervention period. During the study period, the type and dosage of oral anti-diabetic agents, blood pressure drugs, and anti-lipid drugs were consistently maintained. However, in cases where blood glucose was measured to be less than 70 mg/dL, or in cases showing symptoms of hypoglycemia, we decreased sulfonylurea dosages in the oral hypoglycemic agents by 25% to 50%.

Food energy intake and total energy consumption survey

To determine food energy intake and nutrient intake, the rice bowl groups kept dietary records 3 days per week (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day) and reported to us a minimum of once every two weeks. Daily total energy expenditure was monitored using a pedometer (HE-500; Healthengine, Yokohama, Japan), which was recorded during each visit.

The subjects were educated on the diet record method simply before writing the record sheet actually and they were asked to write amount and kinds of all foods taken for a meal, nutrition supplementary foods and snack for a day on the dietary record sheet by themselves. To increase accuracy of the record, a registered dietitian reviewed contents of the sheets by using real-sized food models measuring cups, measuring spoons, when the sheets were returned. For a dietary record resource, CAN-Pro (computer-aided nutritional analysis program, version 2.0; Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea) was used to convert nutrient intake for further analysis.

Diet and exercise education

The subjects maintained ordinary food intake and exercise during the screening period. The small rice bowl group consumed 170-230 kcal of rice per day from a 200 mL bowl (Professional Ceramics [Sunsoodoyeh], Seoul, Korea). The regular rice bowl group consumed 380-480 kcal of rice per day from a 380 mL bowl (Worldware, Seoul, Korea) [10]. For 12 weeks, individuals in both groups aimed to lose 0.45 kg/wk by reducing their regular dietary intake by 500 kcal/day. The proportions of carbohydrate, protein and fat to the total energy intake were recommended to be 55-60%: 15-20%: 20-25%, respectively [12]. To accomplish this, the subjects were supplied with leaflet corresponding to prescribed energy and were educated on tips for putting rice into the bowl and taking side dishes, within 5-10 minutes individual education. Study participants consumed an average of 1,900 kcal/day and aimed to consume at least 1,400 kcal/day. In case of 1,400 kcal, the Korea Diabetes Association recommends 7 exchange units of starch per day, which means 700 kcal of rice per day. So, 2 meals in a day contain 200 kcal and one meal in a day contains 300 kcal.

In the small rice bowl group, bowls were full of rice but not overflowing in case of 200 kcal and filled beyond the brim slightly overflowing in case of 300 kcal. In the regular rice bowl group, bowls were filled by half in case of 200 kcal and by three quarters in case of 300 kcal.

They were asked to use the bowl for every meal and carbohydrate sources such as bread, rice cake, potato, sweet potato were limited through the leaflet. Noodle could substitute for rice but any specific amount for that was not suggested. Fruit intake was shown as the amount per day through the leaflet. For fish, meat and vegetables, the subjects were educated with pictures of diet fitting each food exchanges unit and were asked to practice it but that was not emphasized intensively at each visit. The picture of diet of fish, meat and vegetables were included in the leaflet by focusing on foods frequently found in the preliminary survey.

For the control group, dietary education was offered based on the diabetic dietary guideline of Korean Diabetes Association and food intake was investigated at the start of the study and after 12 weeks.

All subjects were given pedometers (HE-500) to measure total energy expenditure. The same pedometer was used for the duration the study period (12 weeks).

Physical measurement and biochemical test

At the beginning of the study and during each visit, height, body weight, and waist circumference were measured. Subjects were measured for height and body weight dressed in a thin clothe. BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) with the square of the height (m²). The narrowest line between the lower rib and iliac crest was measured as waist circumference with a tapeline when a subject breathed out easily, and blood pressure was gauged in a sitting posture with a mercury sphygmomanometer (Yamasu Co., Saitama, Japan) after10 minutes of rest.

Blood chemistry measurements were taken for all groups at the beginning of the study, and 12 weeks later. Venous blood samples were collected following a 10-hour or longer fast. Samples were separated via centrifuge at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes. Serum was isolated, stored at -70℃, and used for analysis. Fasting blood glucose levels were measured using the glucose oxidation method, and HbA1c was measured using the HPLC method, based on a cation exchange resin. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were examined with kits using enzymatic reactions and an automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi 7170; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Compliance with rice bowl use

To assess compliance of use of rice bowl, the subjects were asked to record whether they used the provided bowls during breakfast, lunch, or dinner. During biweekly visits, subjects were instructed to bring their compliance reports and rice bowl usage compliance was calculated as a percentage. During each visit, the reported values were averaged and overall compliance was calculated as:

Compliance of use of rice bowl (%) = frequency of using bowls/number of total meals × 100.

Data analysis and statistical analysis

Using the statistics program SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), we calculated means and standard deviations for the measured items. Variables that did not follow a normal distribution were analyzed following log transformation. To compare the data among three groups (small rice bowl, regular rice bowl and control), one-way ANOVA test with a Tukey post-hoc analysis was used. A paired t-test was used to compare the groups before and after the intervention period. Categorical variables were compared using a cross-analysis. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

General characteristics of the subjects

A total of 42 subjects were enrolled in this study, and all subjects continued the study for the full 16-week duration. The mean age of the subjects was 55.1 ± 7.1 years. The mean duration of diabetes was 4.3 ± 3.9 years and mean BMI was 27.5 ± 3.6 kg/m². The mean fasting blood glucose level was 147.1 ± 31.2 mg/dL and the mean HbA1c level was 7.6 ± 0.9%. The groups did not show any significant difference in age, duration of diabetes, BMI, fasting blood glucose levels, and HbA1c levels. For diabetes treatments, the proportion of a life style modification only, combination of metformin and sulfonylurea, sulfonylurea only and, metformin only therapy were 57.8%, 26.7%, 4.4%, and 11.1%, respectively. Among the patients taken sulfonylurea, the 31.6% of them reduced their sulfonylurea dosage due to hypoglycemia during intervention period. By the conclusion of the study, the mean sulfonylurea dosage had been reduced to 50% of the initial dosage. There was no difference in the reduced amount of the drug dosage among the groups. The dietary energy intakes and number of steps were 1,928 ± 216 kcal and 9,895 ± 4,042, respectively, with no significant differences among the groups. The proportions of carbohydrate, protein and fat to the total energy intake were 64.0 ± 5.8%, 16.1 ± 2.4% and 20.2 ± 4.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups (Table 1). The proportion of carbohydrates in the diet was higher than that recommended by the Korean Diabetes Association (55-60%). During the 12-week intervention period, the frequencies of rice bowl use during breakfast, lunch, and dinner were 75.4 ± 24.3%, 47.6 ± 28.9%, and 60.5 ± 25.8%, respectively. Between the small and regular rice bowl groups, there was no significant difference in frequency of usage.

Changes in total energy intake and carbohydrate intake

As changes of dietary energy intake and step counts per day during 12 weeks were not consistent, their averages for the 12 weeks were used. Dietary energy intake and nutrient intake were assessed with 3-day dietary record. Dietary energy intake was significantly reduced by -583 ± 203 kcal/day (-30.1 ± 9.8%) and -294 ± 245 kcal/day (-14.8 ± 12.8%) and -130 ± 76 kcal/day (-6.9 ± 3.9%) in the small rice bowl group, regular rice bowl group and control group, respectively in 12 weeks (P < 0.001). After 12 weeks, there was a difference in total energy intake decrease among the groups (P < 0.001), with the small rice bowl group having a greater decrease than the regular rice bowl group and control group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively). The total energy intake of the small rice bowl group decreased by 15.3% more than the regular rice bowl group (Fig. 1). Total number of steps was not different in 12 weeks compared to their initial levels and the change of the three groups were also not significantly different (Table 2).

During the 12-week intervention period, there was a significant decrease in carbohydrate intake in the three groups (P < 0.05). There was a difference among the three groups in their carbohydrate intake decrease (P < 0.001) and the small rice bowl group had a more significant decrease than the control and regular rice bowl group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively).

After 12 weeks, rice bowl group showed significantly reduction protein intake (P < 0.05) and the reduction amount of protein intake was not significantly different among the three groups. There also was a significant decrease in fat intake in the small rice bowl group (P < 0.001), which was greater than that of the regular rice bowl and control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 1).

Although the proportions of carbohydrate, protein and fat to total energy intake initially recorded 64.1:16.0:20.6%, they changed into 61.0:16.6:22.5% in 12 weeks which were more similar with the proportions recommended by Korea Diabetes Association. There was no significant difference among the groups. Fiber, cholesterol and sodium intake were also not different in 12 weeks compared to their initial levels and the changes of the three groups were also not significantly different (Table 2).

Change in body weight

During the 12-week study period, the small rice bowl group, the regular rice bowl group and control group showed significantly reduced body weight by -3.7 ± 2.4 kg (-5.1 ± 2.6%), -2.5 ± 2.4 kg (-3.8 ± 3.8%) and -1.5 ± 2.4 kg (-2.3 ± 1.8%) (P < 0.01). All three groups had differences in the changes for body weight loss (P = 0.031); the small rice bowl group showed a significant decrease in body weight compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Following the 12 week study period, the small rice bowl group, regular rice bowl group and control group showed significantly reduced waist circumferences by -4.8 ± 3.8 cm (-5.1 ± 3.7%), -3.4 ± 3.8 cm (-3.8 ± 4.2%), and -1.6 ± 1.3 cm (-1.8 ± 1.5%), respectively and there was no significant difference in the reduced level among the groups (Table 3).

Change in blood glucose and lipid levels

After the 12-week study period, HbA1c levels in the small rice bowl and regular rice bowl group decreased significantly: -0.8 ± 0.6% and -0.8 ± 0.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). There was significant difference in the decrease in HbA1c levels among the groups (P = 0.025); the small rice bowl and regular rice bowl group had greater decrease than the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the reduced HbA1c levels between the bowl groups (Fig. 2).

Total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C and LDL-C levels were not different in 12 weeks compared to their initial levels and the changes of the three groups were also not significantly different. Systolic blood pressure was decreased significantly in the small rice bowl group (P < 0.05) but there was no significant difference in the reduced levels among the three groups (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

The American Diabetes Association recommends that obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients should reduce their dietary energy intake by 500-1,000 kcal [13] and initially result in a loss of 0.5-1 kg/wk. Several organizations recommend the use of smaller dishes as a strategy for reducing the portion size, with the goal of decreasing energy intake [14]. In one study, Rolls et al. [5] provided 500 g and 1,000 g of macaroni and cheese and reported that doubling one serving size (to 1,000 g) increased energy intake by 30%. In another study, Kral et al. [15] provided meals composed of pasta, vegetables, and cheese at 500 g, 700 g, and 900 g. They reported that the 900 g serving resulted in a 20% greater energy intake than the 500 g serving. Rolls et al. [8] provided equal quantities of food on 17 cm, 22 cm, and 26 cm plates, each used on different days. Using the small plate did not show to a reduction in food intake.

In this study, we attempted to reduce dietary energy intake by 500 kcal in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients through portion control using varying rice bowl sizes. The small rice bowl group reduced total energy intake by -583 kcal, the regular rice bowl group by -294 kcal. The dietary energy intake of the small rice bowl group was reduced compared to the control group. Reducing the size of the serving bowl by 50% (small rice bowl vs. regular rice bowl) appears to reduce dietary energy intake by 15% (289 kcal/day). Thus, the reason why the results of this study differ from those reported by Rolls et al. may be because the process of filling the small rice bowl with smaller portions was measured exactly, resulting in a total energy intake decrease. Steyn et al. [16] showed subjects 29 g of rice 30 minutes after a portion size demonstration, and had the patients choose the portion that was closest to the 29 g portion that they had seen in a 3-D food model. Half the subjects were able to match the portions of equal size, while the others mistook 50 g servings to be 29 g servings. This result shows that patients recognize food portions as being larger than they truly are, and it is possible that consumption is then greater than expected.

To reduce body weight and blood glucose levels in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, total energy intake and appropriate proportions of macronutrients intake should be emphasized. The Korean Diabetes Association [17] advises diabetes patients to consume diets that consist of 55-60% carbohydrates, 15-20% protein, and 20-25% fat. According to a survey of dietitians from general hospitals done by the Food and Nutrition Commission of the Korean Diabetes Association [18], 89.1% educate patients using a food exchange table. Education of obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using the small rice bowl proved to be just as effective as the food exchange table in meeting the recommended levels of carbohydrates, protein, and fat [19]. The applied education method for using the small rice bowl reduced the intake of carbohydrates, protein, and fat. In this study, carbohydrate intakes for the small rice bowl group were reduced by more than those of the control group. Reducing the size of the serving bowl also reduces the amount of carbohydrate intake. Additionally, the fat intake in the small rice bowl group was significantly reduced following the 12-week study period. Similar results were observed in a previous experiment [19].

The reason that fat intake was reduced in the small rice bowl group was solely based on reduction of rice portion size. This is because rice is a staple in a typical Korean diet, and the consumption of soybean oil and sesame oil, which are added to side dishes, has an effect on energy intake [19].

The American Diabetes Association recommends that obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients reduce their body weight by 5-10%. By reducing dietary energy intake by 500-1,000 kcals, patients can expect to reduce their body weight by 8% in 6 months [13]. In this study, educating subjects on the application of the bowls for a 12-week period resulted in a 5.1% reduction in body weight in the small rice bowl group, compared to a 2.3% reduction in the control group, which was a significant reduction in body weight. However, the body weight did not show larger reduction in the standard bowl group than control group.

In type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, medical nutrition therapy by registered dietitians was associated with a 0.2-2.9% decrease in HbA1c after 3-6 months [3]. Wilson et al. [20] reported that medical nutrition therapy by registered dietitians was associated with a 0.26-0.32% decrease in HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (average HbA1c 8%). Kim et al. [21] utilized a food exchanges table oriented towards Korean diabetes patients for 12 weeks using the combined diet and exercise strategies recommended by the diabetes association as a guide, HbA1c levels decreased by 0.7% (from 8.9% to 8.2%). In this study, reducing carbohydrate intake using rice bowl in obese type 2 diabetes patients decreases the HbA1c in small rice bowl group and regular rice bowl group. But even though dietary total energy intake and carbohydrate intake was reduced more in small rice bowl group. There was no significant difference in HbA1c levels between small rice bowl group and regular rice bowl group, which was due to the effects of different oral anti-diabetic agents, duration of diabetes, initial glycated hemoglobin levels, and exercise level [22].

In this study, we observed that Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who consumed rice-centered meals using small rice bowls had lower total energy intake and carbohydrate intakes compared to a control group, which in turn reduced body weight and blood glucose levels. There was more significant reduction in total energy intake and carbohydrate intake in small rice bowl group than regular rice bowl group without additional dietary education. But, there was no addition benefit in body weight and glucose control because the regular rice bowl group and control group had more patients who were regulating diabetes through diet and exercise than the small rice bowl group. The regular rice bowl and control groups also had shorter duration of diabetes and consisted of patients with higher HbA1c levels.

Because this study was conducted only in a single hospital and its sample size was small, the effects and changes of body weight and HbA1c levels could not be examined.

In addition, future studies are needed to compare effects of education using varying rice bowl size with obese patients with different knowledge levels, gender and age. In particular, this study had limitations that it examined only women who took relatively more carbohydrate and followed further management relatively well and that it did not show clinical outcomes of various groups.

REFERENCES

• 1. Li Z, Hong K, Saltsman P, DeShields S, Bellman M, Thames G, Liu Y, Wang HJ, Elashoff R, Heber D. Long-term efficacy of soy-based meal replacements vs an individualized diet plan in obese type II DM patients: relative effects on weight loss, metabolic parameters, and C-reactive protein. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:411-418. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 2. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:481-486. ArticlePubMed
• 3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl 1):S11-S61. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 4. Ledikwe JH, Ello-Martin JA, Rolls BJ. Portion sizes and the obesity epidemic. J Nutr 2005;135:905-909. ArticlePubMed
• 5. Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS. Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:1207-1213. ArticlePubMed
• 6. Pedersen SD, Kang J, Kline GA. Portion control plate for weight loss in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1277-1283. ArticlePubMed
• 7. Hebert JR, Ma Y, Clemow L, Ockene IS, Saperia G, Stanek EJ 3rd, Merriam PA, Ockene JK. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:1046-1055. ArticlePubMed
• 8. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS. Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 2007;49:652-660. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 9. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Korean national health nutrition examination survey 2005. 2007. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare.
• 10. Ahn HJ, Koo BK, Jung JY, Kwon HR, Chung MY, Ku YH, Kim JT, Han KA, Min KW. Association between volume of bowls and the dietary intakes in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Korean Diabetes J 2009;33:335-343.Article
• 11. Ahn HJ, Eom YK, Han KA, Kwon HR, Kim HJ, Park KS, Min KW. The effects of small sized rice bowl on carbohydrate intake and dietary patterns in women with type 2 diabetes. Korean Diabetes J 2010;34:166-173. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 12. Korean Diabetes Association. A guideline for diabetes education. 2006. 2nd ed. Seoul: Gold Agency.
• 13. Klein S, Sheard NF, Pi-Sunyer X, Daly A, Wylie-Rosett J, Kulkarni K, Clark NG. American Diabetes Association. North American Association for the Study of Obesity. American Society for Clinical Nutrition. Weight management through lifestyle modification for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and strategies: a statement of the American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2067-2073. ArticlePubMed
• 14. Ello-Martin JA, Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ. The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(1 Suppl):236S-241S. ArticlePubMed
• 15. Kral TV, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:962-968. ArticlePubMed
• 16. Steyn NP, Senekal M, Norris SA, Whati L, Mackeown JM, Nel JH. How well do adolescents determine portion sizes of foods and beverages? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006;15:35-42. PubMedPMC
• 17. Korean Diabetes Association. Staged diabetes management. 2007. 3rd ed. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association; p. 3-9.
• 18. Cho JW. The present status of diabetes education and opinion research of food exchange list. Korean Diabetes J 2008;32(Suppl 2):S109-S114.
• 19. Ahn HJ, Han KA, Kwon HR, Koo BK, Kim HJ, Park KS, Min KW. Small rice bowl-based meal plan versus food exchange-based meal plan for weight, glucose and lipid control in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Korean Diabetes J 2010;34:86-94. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 20. Wilson C, Brown T, Acton K, Gilliland S. Effects of clinical nutrition education and educator discipline on glycemic control outcomes in the Indian health service. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2500-2504. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 21. Kim SH, Kang ES, Park SY, Lee SJ, Kim MJ, Yoo JS, Ahn CW, Cha BS, Lim SK, Lee HC. The effects of lifestyle modification on the metabolic parameters of type 2 diabetes. J Korean Diabetes Assoc 2004;28:441-451.
• 22. Khan MA, St Peter JV, Breen GA, Hartley GG, Vessey JT. Diabetes disease stage predicts weight loss outcomes with long-term appetite suppressants. Obes Res 2000;8:43-48. ArticlePubMed

Fig. 1

Change of EI (A), carbohydrate intake (B), fat intake (C) and protein intake (D) after 12-week's intervention in obese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The reduction in EI, carbohydrate, and fat intake in the SB group was more prominent than that in the C group (P < 0.05). The reduction of EI and carbohydrate intake in the SB group was greater than that in the RB group (P < 0.05). C, control; EI, energy intake; SB, small size rice bowl (200 mL bowl); RB, regular size rice bowl (380 mL bowl). ^aP values < 0.05 vs. C group, ^bP values < 0.05 vs. RB group.

Fig. 2

Change in body weight (A) and HbA1c (B) after 12-week bowl intervention or control in obese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BW decreased in the SB group but not in the RB group, compared to the C group (P < 0.05). HbA1c levels decreased in the bowl groups without difference between the bowl groups (P < 0.05). HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; BW, body weight; C, control; SB, small size rice bowl (200 mL bowl); RB, regular size rice bowl (380 mL bowl). ^aP values < 0.05 vs. C group.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

SB, small size rice bowl (200 mL bowl); RB, regular size rice bowl (380 mL bowl); C, control; BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; EI, energy intake.

^aP values are for comparison among the groups by one-way ANOVA test.

Table 2

Changes in dietary energy intake, macronutrient composition

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

EI, energy intake; SB, small size rice bowl (200 mL bowl); RB, regular size rice bowl (380 mL bowl); C, control.

^aP values are for comparison for changes from baseline to post-intervention among the groups by one-way ANOVA test, statistically significant in Tukey post-hoc analysis, ^bP values < 0.05 are for comparison between baseline and intervention within a group by paired t-test.

Table 3

Change in body weight, blood glucose, and plasma lipids

Values were presented as mean ± standard deviation.

BW, body weight; SB, small size rice bowl (200 mL bowl); RB, regular size rice bowl (380 mL bowl); C, control; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

^aP values are for comparison for changes from baseline to post-intervention among the groups by one-way ANOVA test, statistically significant in Tukey post-hoc analysis, ^bP values < 0.05 are for comparison between baseline and post-intervention within group by paired t-test.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  M. Angeles Vargas-Alvarez, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Luigi Palla, J. Alfredo Martínez, Eva Almiron-Roig
  Nutrients.2021; 13(6): 1978.     CrossRef
• Do adults draw differently-sized meals on larger or smaller plates? Examining plate size in a community sample
  David Sharp, Jeffery Sobal, Elaine Wethington
  Food Quality and Preference.2019; 74: 72.     CrossRef
• Use and effectiveness of behavioural economics in interventions for lifestyle risk factors of non-communicable diseases: a systematic review with policy implications
  Oana M Blaga, Livia Vasilescu, Razvan M Chereches
  Perspectives in Public Health.2018; 138(2): 100.     CrossRef
• Whether Smaller Plates Reduce Consumption Depends on Who's Serving and Who's Looking: A Meta-Analysis
  Stephen S. Holden, Natalina Zlatevska, Chris Dubelaar
  SSRN Electronic Journal .2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco
  Gareth J Hollands, Ian Shemilt, Theresa M Marteau, Susan A Jebb, Hannah B Lewis, Yinghui Wei, Julian P T Higgins, David Ogilvie
  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef

About this article

Ahn HJ, Han KA, Kwon HR, Min KW. The Small Rice Bowl-Based Meal Plan was Effective at Reducing Dietary Energy Intake, Body Weight, and Blood Glucose Levels in Korean Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2010;34(6):340-349.

Received: Jul 11, 2010; Accepted: Sep 06, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/kdj.2010.34.6.340.

Download citation ↓