Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Diabetes Metab J > Volume 41(2); 2017 > Article
Original Article
Complications Lipid Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Overt Nephropathy
Sabitha Palazhyorcid, Vijay Viswanathan
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2017;41(2):128-134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2017.41.2.128
Published online: January 11, 2017
  • 4,538 Views
  • 56 Download
  • 34 Web of Science
  • 38 Crossref
  • 36 Scopus

M.V. Hospital for Diabetes & Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.

corresp_icon Corresponding author: Sabitha Palazhy. M.V. Hospital for Diabetes & Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, No. 4, West Madha Church St, Royapuram, Chennai 600013, India. sabitha.palazhy@gmail.com
• Received: April 6, 2016   • Accepted: November 7, 2016

Copyright © 2017 Korean Diabetes Association

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • Background
    Diabetic nephropathy is a major complication of diabetes and an established risk factor for cardiovascular events. Lipid abnormalities occur in patients with diabetic nephropathy, which further increase their risk for cardiovascular events. We compared the degree of dyslipidemia among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects with and without nephropathy and analyzed the factors associated with nephropathy among them.
  • Methods
    In this retrospective study, T2DM patients with overt nephropathy were enrolled in the study group (n=89) and without nephropathy were enrolled in the control group (n=92). Both groups were matched for age and duration of diabetes. Data on total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), urea and creatinine were collected from the case sheets. TG/HDL-C ratio, a surrogate marker for small, dense, LDL particles (sdLDL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were calculated using equations. Multivariate analysis was done to determine the factors associated with eGFR.
  • Results
    Dyslipidemia was present among 56.52% of control subjects and 75.28% of nephropathy subjects (P=0.012). The percentage of subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia (high TG+low HDL-C+sdLDL) was 14.13 among controls and 14.61 among nephropathy subjects. Though serum creatinine was not significantly different, mean eGFR value was significantly lower among nephropathy patients (P=0.002). Upon multivariate analysis, it was found that TC (P=0.007) and HDL-C (P=0.06) were associated with eGFR among our study subjects.
  • Conclusion
    Our results show that dyslipidemia was highly prevalent among subjects with nephropathy. Regular screening for dyslipidemia may be beneficial in controlling the risk for adverse events among diabetic nephropathy patients.
Dyslipidemia is an important clinical abnormality seen in patients with diabetes mellitus. The characteristic features of diabetic dyslipidemia are high plasma triglycerides (TG) concentration, low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration and increased concentration of small, dense, low density lipoprotein (sdLDL) particles. Insulin resistance leads to mobilization of free fatty acid from adipose tissue to liver, which causes increased TG production. Dysfunction of lipoprotein lipase due to long-standing diabetes would further increase TG level causing accumulation of large TG-rich very low density lipoprotein particles, which in turn generate sdLDL particles [1]. Thus, even when low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients is not elevated, they still have a preponderance of atherogenic sdLDL particles [2].
Diabetic nephropathy is one of the major complications of diabetes, characterized by proteinuria and renal insufficiency. It is also an established risk factor for cardiovascular events as well as mortality [3]. Lipoprotein abnormalities are known to occur among patients with diabetic nephropathy, and majority of such patients die of cardiovascular events before their renal dysfunction progresses to end stage renal disease [45]. Diabetic nephropathy causes quantitative as well as compositional abnormalities in lipids. An increased presence of atherogenic sdLDL particles is observed even among diabetic nephropathy patients with normal total cholesterol (TC) and TG concentration [4].
Moreover, dyslipidemia is shown to accelerate the rate of renal damage. Clinical and experimental studies have reported that dyslipidemia leads to progressive loss of renal function among diabetic patients [6]. The mechanism behind this action is not been fully elucidated, but it has been proposed that lipids may damage vascular, mesangial, and tubular cells of kidneys [7]. Underlying dysglycemia among diabetic patients further accelerates the renal damage induced by dyslipidemia [8]. Thus, dyslipidemia and nephropathy act synergistically in worsening the clinical condition and increase the risk of renal or cardiovascular consequences among diabetic patients.
There are studies from India that have assessed lipid abnormalities in subjects with chronic renal failure [910], but studies on diabetic nephropathy per se are few. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing the extent of dyslipidemia among diabetic nephropathy patients and also evaluated the risk factors associated with nephropathy among them.
Subjects
This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care diabetes specialty hospital in South India after obtaining necessary ethical clearance. Case sheets of randomly selected subjects with established T2DM were screened for the study. Subjects with urinary tract infection, hematuria, established coronary artery disease, thyroid dysfunction, and end stage renal disease were excluded from the study. Subjects with irregular follow-up, missing data or who underwent blood investigations in external labs were also excluded from the study. The case sheets were reviewed and subjects without nephropathy were included in control group (group 1) and with overt nephropathy were included in study group (group 2). The inclusion/exclusion criteria were as follows: Group 1 included subjects with T2DM, but without history of albuminuria or proteinuria, as indicated by <30 mg of albumin per gram of creatinine on a spot urine sample, in the three most recent lab reports. Group 2 included subjects with overt nephropathy. Subjects with persistent proteinuria, defined as albumin/creatinine ratio of >300 mg of albumin per gram of creatinine on a spot urine sample, in at least two of the three most recent urine analysis, were considered to have overt nephropathy in this study. Onset of diabetes should have preceded the onset of nephropathy among the patients of this group. We screened 439 case sheets, and finally enrolled 92 subjects in control group (group 1) and 89 in diabetic nephropathy group (group 2). The two groups were matched for age and duration of diabetes. Anthropometric details such as height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded from the case sheets. Details regarding their medications, diet and lifestyle habits were also collected.
Laboratory analysis
TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, urea, and creatinine had been measured in serum using kits from Roche (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) on BS-400 Mindray Chemistry analyzer. HbA1c had been estimated by High Performance Liquid Chromatography on Bio-Rad D-10 system using kits from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). These analytical procedures had been standardized and conducted routinely in the clinical laboratory of the hospital. TG/HDL-C ratio was calculated as a surrogate marker for the presence of sdLDL. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from serum creatinine values for the study subjects using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The categorical variables were represented as percentages and measurable variables as mean±standard deviation. Chi-square test was performed for comparing categorical variables, t-test was done to compare the continuous variables between the two groups and a P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Mann-Whitney U test was conducted for continuous variables with high standard deviations and P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant here also. Pearson correlation analysis was done to find out the association between lipid parameters and indicators of kidney function. Multiple regression analysis was done to identify the factors independently associated with eGFR.
The mean age was 54.28±9.26 and 55.72±10.33 years and mean duration of diabetes was 10.76±7.61 and 12.27±7.04 for controls and nephropathy subjects, respectively. The male:female ratio was 70:22 and 61:28 respectively for these groups. Approximately 50% (n=97) of the subjects in the study had a positive family history of diabetes among their first degree relatives. Among group two subjects, 8.99% (n=8) had a positive family history of kidney disease, compared to 5.43% (n=5) among group 1. The percentage of subjects whose family history of kidney disease could not be ascertained from case sheets was 6.52% (n=6) in group 1 and 12.36% (n=11) in group 2. The prevalence of neuropathy, a diabetes related complication was higher among nephropathy patients compared to controls (P=0.05). But the prevalence of hypertension and retinopathy were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.499 and P=0.185 respectively) (Table 1).
Among the total study participants, 67.96% (n=123) were on oral hypoglycemic agents, 23.2% (n=42) were on a combination therapy of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents and 8.84% (n=16) were exclusively on insulin. On comparing the two groups, it was observed that the percentage of subjects on oral hypoglycemic agents or oral hypoglycemic agents+insulin or insulin alone were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.588, P=0.537, and P=0.389 respectively) (Table 1). Among the total study participants, 42.54% (n=77) were on statins alone, 4.42% (n=8) were on a combination of statin and fibrate and 0.55% (n=1) were on statin+ezetimibe therapy. When the two groups were compared, the percentage of statin users were found to be significantly higher among subjects with nephropathy (31.52% vs. 53.93% [n=29 vs. n=48], P=0.0001). The percentage of subjects on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) did not differ significantly between the non-nephropathy and nephropathy groups (ACEi: 42.39% vs. 41.57% [n=39 vs. n=37], P=1.0; ARB: 6.52% vs. 12.36% [n=6 vs. n=11], P=0.491) (Table 1).
The results of anthropometric and biochemical assessments of the two groups of subjects are given in Table 2. BMI did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.15). TC was significantly higher for group with diabetic nephropathy (P<0.001), so was TG and LDL-C (P=0.016 and P=0.002, respectively). Serum urea was higher among nephropathy subjects (P=0.067). Though serum creatinine was not significantly different, mean eGFR value was significantly lower among nephropathy patients (P=0.002) (Table 2).
The percentage of subjects with one or other form of dyslipidemia (TC ≥200 mg/dL or TG ≥150 mg/dL or HDL-C ≤35 mg/dL [for men] and ≤40 mg/dL [for women] or LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL or a combination of these conditions) was 56.52% (n=52) among non-nephropathy group and 75.28% (n=67) among nephropathy group (P=0.012). The percentage of subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia was 14.13% (n=13) among controls and 14.61% (n=13) among nephropathy subjects. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in this study is defined as TG ≥150 mg/dL+HDL-C ≤35 mg/dL (for men) and ≤40 mg/dL (for women)+TG/HDL-C ratio ≥3. Higher TG/HDL-C ratio (≥3), which is used as a surrogate marker for sdLDL was found among 70.33% (n=65) of non-nephropathy group and 75.28% (n=67) of nephropathy group (Table 3).
The percentage of subjects with dyslipidemia was lower among statin users compared to those not on statin therapy in the nephropathy group (38.46% vs. 64.86% [n=20/52 vs. n=24/37], P=0.014). On the contrary, the percentage of subjects with dyslipidemia did not differ significantly between statin and non-statin subgroups in the control group (32.35% vs. 36.21% [n=11/34 vs. n=21/58], P=0.59). The occurrence of dyslipidemia did not differ when subjects on ACEi or ARB were compared to those not on ACEi or ARB in both groups (53.33% vs. 48.94% [n=24/45 vs. n=23/47], P=0.673 for controls; 62.5% vs. 58.54% [n=30/48 vs. n=24/41], P=0.703 for nephropathy group).
TC, TG, LDL-C, and sdLDL were found to have mild positive correlation with serum urea (r=0.276, r=0.241, r=0.248, and r=0.326, respectively) and serum creatinine (r=0.287, r=0.239, r=0.26, and r=0.226, respectively) and inverse correlation with eGFR (r=−0.29, r=−0.236, r=−0.255, and r=−0.198, respectively). Multiple regression analysis was conducted by considering eGFR, an established indicator for nephropathy as dependent variable and TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, BMI, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c as independent variables. eGFR was identified as the dependent variable as some patients may demonstrate “non-proteinuric diabetic nephropathy.” It was found that TC (P=0.007) and HDL-C (P=0.06) were associated with eGFR among the study subjects (Table 4).
According to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines for lipid management in chronic kidney disease, adults with recently identified kidney disease should be evaluated for dyslipidemia, as this condition, though not universal, is commonly present among people with nephropathy [11]. The percentage of subjects with dyslipidemia was significantly higher in nephropathy group in this study. Proteinuria, which is the hallmark of diabetic nephropathy, causes an increase in LDL-C fraction, whereas in advanced renal dysfunction, a reduction of HDL-C levels is also noted [12]. Post hoc analysis of large scale trials such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) revealed that albuminuria is associated with higher levels of TC, TG, and LDL-C [13]. The results of our study show that TC, TG, and LDL-C levels were significantly higher among the nephropathy patients. A study among related South Indian population has also shown that TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C were significantly different between diabetic and diabetic nephropathy patients [14]. A study conducted even in a different ethnic population has observed results similar to the present study [15]. Another study showed that dyslipidemia associated with diabetic nephropathy is not limited to T2DM subjects, but is present among type 1 patients as well [16]. The mean HbA1c% of the subjects of both groups in our study highlights their poor glycemic status (9.54±1.86 and 9.4±2.4 for controls and nephropathy subjects, respectively). Since sustained hyperglycemia has profound effects on lipid metabolism, dyslipidemia among subjects of this study might be related to their poor glycemic control also.
The percentage of subjects with sdLDL, indicated by TG/HDL-C ratio, was high among both groups in this study population, though the percentage did not differ significantly between the two groups. On the contrary, a study among diabetic Japanese subjects had shown that LDL particle size was significantly lower in nephropathy patients compared to subjects without nephropathy [17]. Atherogenic dyslipidemia, i.e., co-existence of high TG, low HDL-C and presence of sdLDL particles was found among approximately 14% of subjects of both groups. The presence of atherogenic dyslipidemia or sdLDL particles could increase their risk for adverse cardiac events. The correlation between lipid parameters and kidney function parameters in the current study implies that dyslipidemia is associated with renal insufficiency in this population. Various prospective studies have shown that there is significant correlation between renal outcome and dyslipidemia [18]. Therapeutic intervention using statins to reduce cholesterol level has been recognized to reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events among subjects with kidney disease [19]. There are data available which show that the treatment of dyslipidemia with statins can improve renal outcomes, though this is not proven conclusively [11]. Though subjects on statin therapy had lower incidence of dyslipidemia compared to non-statin subjects in the nephropathy group in the present study, the occurrence of dyslipidemia even among statin users in both groups is a major cause of concern. This could indicate the need for a more aggressive hypocholesterolemic therapy among them to attain favorable cardiac as well as renal outcomes.
Among lipid parameters, TC and HDL-C were observed to be associated with nephropathy in this study. Previous studies have shown that TC level was associated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with chronic renal failure [2021]. Chen et al. [22] in a more recent large-scale study among 3,303 patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 5, observed that the association between TC and mortality is different among patients with different levels of proteinuria. Though Pearson correlation analysis did not demonstrate any significant correlation between HDL-C and eGFR, HDL-C was identified to be associated with declining eGFR in our study, on regression analysis. A community-based, cross sectional survey concluded that HDL-C is independently associated with eGFR after adjustment for multiple covariates in the general population [23]. Physicians Health Study had demonstrated that the risk for deterioration of renal function was significant among subjects with elevated cholesterol or low HDL-C, even at mildly elevated serum creatinine values [24]. It should be noted that small number of patients, unadjusted clinical parameters, and retrospective study method might have influenced the results of regression analysis in the present study.
While assessing for associated microvascular complications, it was found that the prevalence of neuropathy was significantly higher among patients with nephropathy in this study. The co-existence of microvascular complications in Indian population has been identified by an earlier study [25]. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that proper glycemic control can significantly reduce the incidence of these complications [26]. It should be noted that the prevalence of hypertension was also high among the subjects of this study. Rigorous control of blood pressure is shown to have beneficial effects on reducing the incidence or progression of microvascular complications [27].
Thus, the observations from this study show that nephropathy patients had poor glycemic as well as lipid control and that comorbidities such as hypertension and neuropathy were highly prevalent among them. This warrants early screening and stringent therapeutic intervention for optimal regulation of these conditions among them.
Despite being a retrospective analysis of small sample size, the study has been able to obtain useful data on the prevalence of dyslipidemia among diabetic nephropathy patients. Though the role of therapeutic intervention such as statin treatment in the regulation of blood cholesterol is undisputed, prospective studies are needed to inconclusively prove their effect in reducing mortality due to cardiovascular events among nephropathy patients.
In conclusion, our study results indicate that dyslipidemia was highly prevalent among diabetic subjects of this population, more so among nephropathy patients. Furthermore, the preponderance of sdLDL particles observed in this population amplifies their risk for future cardiovascular events. Stringent regulation of dyslipidemia and dysglycemia could be an effective strategy in reducing the risk of renal or cardiovascular events, as accepted universally.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Ms. Udhaiya Sangavi, Ms. Thenmozhi and the staff of Medical Records Department for help in procurement of case sheets and data collection.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • 1. Packard CJ. Triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins and the generation of small, dense low-density lipoprotein. Biochem Soc Trans 2003;31(Pt 5):1066-1069. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 2. Haffner SM. American Diabetes Association. Management of dyslipidemia in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S83-S86. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 3. Parving HH, Persson F, Rossing P. Microalbuminuria: a parameter that has changed diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015;107:1-8. ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Samuelsson O, Mulec H, Knight-Gibson C, Attman PO, Kron B, Larsson R, Weiss L, Wedel H, Alaupovic P. Lipoprotein abnormalities are associated with increased rate of progression of human chronic renal insufficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:1908-1915. ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296-1305. ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Breyer JA, Bain RP, Evans JK, Nahman NS Jr, Lewis EJ, Cooper M, McGill J, Berl T. Predictors of the progression of renal insufficiency in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and overt diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. Kidney Int 1996;50:1651-1658. PubMed
  • 7. Keane WF. The role of lipids in renal disease: future challenges. Kidney Int Suppl 2000;75:S27-S31. ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Trevisan R, Dodesini AR, Lepore G. Lipids and renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17(4):Suppl 2. S145-S147. ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Sharma BK, Jindal SK, Rana DS, Gupta B, Kumar M. Absence of hyperlipidaemia in patients of chronic renal failure in Chandigarh. Indian J Med Res 1980;72:461-464. PubMed
  • 10. Das BS, Misra SK, Rao DV, Satpathy SR, Bose TK. Serum lipid in chronic renal failure. J Assoc Physicians India 1984;32:1019-1021. PubMed
  • 11. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Lipid Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for lipid management in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011) 2013;3:259-305.PMC
  • 12. Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Christlieb AR. Hypercholesterolemia: a determinant of renal function loss and deaths in IDDM patients with nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl 1994;45:S125-S131. PubMed
  • 13. Jenkins AJ, Lyons TJ, Zheng D, Otvos JD, Lackland DT, McGee D, Garvey WT, Klein RL. DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Lipoproteins in the DCCT/EDIC cohort: associations with diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 2003;64:817-828. ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Suchitra MM, Sheshu Kumar M, Bitla AR, Madhusudhana Rao A, Alok S. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in diabetic nephropathy: lipoprotein (a), lipid ratios and atherogenic index. Int J Res Med Sci 2013;1:455-459.Article
  • 15. Jisieike-Onuigbo NN, Unuigbe EI, Kalu OA, Oguejiofor CO, Onuigbo PC. Prevalence of dyslipidemia among adult diabetic patients with overt diabetic nephropathy in Anambra state south-east Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2011;14:171-175. ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Attman PO, Knight-Gibson C, Tavella M, Samuelsson O, Alaupovic P. The compositional abnormalities of lipoproteins in diabetic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:2833-2841. ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Hirano T, Naito H, Kurokawa M, Ebara T, Nagano S, Adachi M, Yoshino G. High prevalence of small LDL particles in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with nephropathy. Atherosclerosis 1996;123:57-72. ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Appel GB, Radhakrishnan J, Avram MM, DeFronzo RA, Escobar-Jimenez F, Campos MM, Burgess E, Hille DA, Dickson TZ, Shahinfar S, Brenner BM. RENAAL Study. Analysis of metabolic parameters as predictors of risk in the RENAAL study. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1402-1407. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Sandhu S, Wiebe N, Fried LF, Tonelli M. Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2006-2016. PubMed
  • 20. Contreras G, Hu B, Astor BC, Greene T, Erlinger T, Kusek JW, Lipkowitz M, Lewis JA, Randall OS, Hebert L, Wright JT Jr, Kendrick CA, Gassman J, Bakris G, Kopple JD, Appel LJ. African-American Study of Kidney Disease, and Hypertension Study Group. Malnutrition-inflammation modifies the relationship of cholesterol with cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:2131-2142. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 21. Liu Y, Coresh J, Eustace JA, Longenecker JC, Jaar B, Fink NE, Tracy RP, Powe NR, Klag MJ. Association between cholesterol level and mortality in dialysis patients: role of inflammation and malnutrition. JAMA 2004;291:451-459. ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Chen SC, Hung CC, Tsai YC, Huang JC, Kuo MC, Lee JJ, Chiu YW, Chang JM, Hwang SJ, Chen HC. Association of cholesterol levels with mortality and cardiovascular events among patients with CKD and different amounts of proteinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:1915-1926. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 23. Wang F, Zheng J, Ye P, Luo L, Bai Y, Xu R, Sheng L, Xiao T, Wu H. Association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the estimated glomerular filtration rate in a community-based population. PLoS One 2013;8:e79738ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 24. Schaeffner ES, Kurth T, Curhan GC, Glynn RJ, Rexrode KM, Baigent C, Buring JE, Gaziano JM. Cholesterol and the risk of renal dysfunction in apparently healthy men. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:2084-2091. ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Chandy A, Pawar B, John M, Isaac R. Association between diabetic nephropathy and other diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2008;19:924-928. PubMed
  • 26. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-853. ArticlePubMed
  • 27. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ 1998;317:713-720. ArticlePubMedPMC
Table 1

Comparison of the clinical profile of the two groups

dmj-41-128-i001.jpg
Variable Group 1 (n=92)
Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
Group 2 (n=89)
Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
P value
Mean age, yr 54.28±9.26 55.72±10.33 0.155
Mean duration of diabetes, yr 10.76±7.61 12.27±7.04 0.166
Sex, male:female 70:22 61:28 0.256
Family history of diabetes 42 (45.65) 45 (50.56) 0.236
Family history of kidney disease 5 (5.43) 8 (8.99) 0.157
Retinopathy 25 (27.17) 32 (35.96) 0.185
Neuropathy 20 (21.74) 31 (34.83) 0.050
Hypertension 45 (48.91) 48 (53.93) 0.499
Oral antidiabetic drug 60 (65.22) 63 (70.79) 0.588
Oral antidiabetic drug+Insulin 22 (23.91) 20 (22.47) 0.537
Insulin alone 10 (10.87) 6 (6.74) 0.389
Statin alone 29 (31.52) 48 (53.93) 0.001
Statin+Ezetimibe - 1 (1.12) -
Statin+Fibrate 5 (5.43) 3 (3.37) 0.144
ACEi 39 (42.39) 37 (41.57) 1.000
ARB 6 (6.25) 11 (12.36) 0.491

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker.

Table 2

Comparison of anthropometric measurements and biochemical estimations between subjects with and without nephropathy

dmj-41-128-i002.jpg
Variable Group 1 (n=92)
Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
Group 2 (n=89)
Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
95% CI of the difference P value
BMI, kg/m2 27.2±3.6 26.47±3.18 −0.27 to 1.72 0.15
HbA1c, % 9.54±1.86 9.4±2.4 −0.48 to 0.78 0.646
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 174.76±36.12 211.76±70.27 −53.36 to −20.62 <0.001
Triglycerides, mg/dL 160.14±84.7 189.64±114.71 −59 to 0.009 0.016
HDL-C, mg/dL 42±15.86 40.91±11 −5.14 to 2.96 0.597
LDL-C, mg/dL 101.69±36.5 121.18±45.27 −31.69 to −7.3 0.002
Non-HDL-C, mg/dL 135.62±33.66 162.63±75.34 −44.26 to −9.72 0.002
sdLDL 4.52±3.93 5.14±4.13 −1.81 to 0.57 0.104
Urea, mg/dL 32.85±18.11 38.05±18.7 −10.76 to 0.37 0.067
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.18±0.52 1.29±0.58 −0.27 to 0.05 0.203
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 85.62±33.67 70.21±28.04 5.97 to 24.85 0.002

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; sdLDL, small, dense, LDL; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 3

Comparison of the occurrence of dyslipidemia between subjects with and without nephropathy

dmj-41-128-i003.jpg
Variable Group 1 (n=92)
Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
Group 2 (n=89)
Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
P value
Dyslipidemiaa 52 (56.52) 67 (75.28) 0.012
sdLDLb 65 (70.33) 67 (75.28) 0.772
Atherogenic dyslipidemiac 13 (14.13) 13 (14.61) 1.0

Values are presented as number (%).

sdLDL, small, dense, low density lipoprotein.

aDyslipidemia: total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL or triglycerides (TG) ≥150 mg/dL or high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≤35 mg/dL (for men) and ≤40 mg/dL (for women) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL or a combination of these conditions, bsdLDL: TG/HDL-C ratio >3, cAtherogenic dyslipidemia: TG ≥150 mg/dL+HDL-C ≤35 mg/dL (for men) and ≤40 mg/dL (for women)+sdLDL ratio >3.

Table 4

Results of multiple linear regression analysis with estimated glomerular filtration rate as dependent variable

dmj-41-128-i004.jpg
Independent variable Unstandardized coefficient B Standard error P value R square for the model
BMI −0.666 0.700 0.343 0.131
Diabetes duration −0.455 0.353 0.200
HbA1c 1.098 1.123 0.330
Total cholesterol −0.230 0.084 0.007
Triglycerides 0.000 0.031 0.993
HDL-C 0.421 0.225 0.063
LDL-C 0.053 0.090 0.553

BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Research Progress on Pathogenesis and Early Biomarkers of Diabetic Kidney Disease
      玉金 王
      Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(04): 703.     CrossRef
    • Proanthocyanidin offers protection against diabetic nephropathy: elucidation of its mechanism of action using animal models
      Dengpiao Xie, Huan Wang, Qing Ji, Jianting Wang
      Pharmaceutical Biology.2024; 62(1): 702.     CrossRef
    • Association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) and diabetic kidney disease in patients with diabetes in the United States: a cross-sectional study
      Jingjing Pan, Changnian Li, Jiayi Zhang, Zhenhua Sun, Xiaoying Yu, Qianhui Wan, Zhishen Ruan, Wenbo Wang, Yujie Li
      Lipids in Health and Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Association of matrix metalloproteinase‐2 gene variants with diabetic nephropathy risk
      Sameh Sarray, Laila Ben Lamine, Meriem Dallel, Intissar Ezzidi, Nejla Sellami, Amira Turki, Amgad Elbaz El‐Agroudy Moustafa, Nabil Mtiraoui
      The Journal of Gene Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Association of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with lipid abnormalities and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
      Sitaram Khadka, Gopal K. Yadav, Prativa Subedi, Kapil Amgain, Arun Sharma, Rinku Joshi
      Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(9): 4329.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio, Low-Density Lipoprotein/Albumin Ratio, and Red Cell Distribution Width/Albumin Ratio in the Estimation of Proteinuria in Uncontrolled Diabetic Patients
      Duygu Tutan, Murat Doğan
      Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Correlation between alternative insulin resistance indexes and diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective study
      Xiaodie Mu, Aihua Wu, Huiyue Hu, Min Yang, Hua Zhou
      Endocrine.2023; 84(1): 136.     CrossRef
    • Asprosin in early detection of nephropathy in type2 diabetes mellitus
      Ola Hussein Abed Alwahid, Talat Tariq Khalil, Mohamed Abed AL-Ridha Ismael
      Medical Journal of Babylon.2023; 20(4): 689.     CrossRef
    • Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol is a Potential Marker for Predicting Laser Treatment for Retinopathy in Diabetic Patients
      Atsuko Nakayama, Hiroyuki Morita, Tatsuyuki Sato, Takuya Kawahara, Norifumi Takeda, Satoshi Kato, Hiroshi Itoh, Issei Komuro
      Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis.2022; 29(5): 678.     CrossRef
    • Estimation of Fluoride and Sirtuin1 in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy in Kolar District of Karnataka, India
      Sai Deepika Ram Mohan, Kurpad N. Shashidhar, Raveesha Anjanappa, Muninarayana Chandrappa
      Journal of Laboratory Physicians.2022; 14(01): 057.     CrossRef
    • The Relationship of 25(OH)D3 with Diabetes Mellitus and the Mediation Effect of Lipid Profile in Chinese Rural Population of Henan Province
      Mimi Zhang, Fei Yu, Yuan Xue, Lulu Song, Mengsi Du, Xing Li, Wenjie Li
      Medicina.2022; 58(1): 85.     CrossRef
    • Dyslipidemia and its associated factors among adult diabetes outpatients in West Shewa zone public hospitals, Ethiopia
      Daba Abdissa, Delessa Hirpa
      BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Exploring Fenofibrate Formulations for the Treatment of Lipid Disorders: Past, Present, and Future
      Thu Nhan Nguyen, Jeong-Sook Park
      CardioMetabolic Syndrome Journal.2022; 2(2): 77.     CrossRef
    • Assessment of level of care of diabetic patients with nephropathy in predialysis stage 4 in Tanta
      Ahmed A.A. Elmoghany, Mohammed H. El-Naggar, Ali El-Sherbiny, Ingy A.W. Ibrahim
      Tanta Medical Journal.2022; 50(4): 267.     CrossRef
    • Prediction models and nomograms for 10‐year risk of end‐stage renal disease in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in primary care
      Weinan Dong, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Daniel Yee Tak Fong, Ruby Lai Ping Kwok, David Vai Kiong Chao, Kathryn Choon Beng Tan, Eric Ming Tung Hui, Wendy Wing Sze Tsui, King Hong Chan, Colman Siu Cheung Fung, Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
      Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2021; 23(4): 897.     CrossRef
    • Matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene polymorphism (-1562 C/T) and its correlation with diabetic nephropathy
      Kholoud Shalaby, Rania Bahriz, Nancy Mahsoub, Mohammed M. El-Arman, Ghada El-Said
      The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Antidiabetic and Nephroprotective Effects of Polysaccharide Extract from the Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa in High Fructose-Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Nephropathy
      Meng Cao, Yan Li, Ademola C Famurewa, Opeyemi Joshua Olatunji
      Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy.2021; Volume 14: 2121.     CrossRef
    • A Study of Creatinine Level among Patients with Dyslipidemia and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Multilayer Perceptron and Multiple Linear Regression
      Farah Muna Mohamad Ghazali, Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad, Kumar Chandan Srivastava, Deepti Shrivastava, Nor Farid Mohd Noor, Nurul Farid Nizam Akbar, Nor A Aleng, Mohammad Azlida Alam
      Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.2021; 13(Suppl 1): S795.     CrossRef
    • L-ergothioneine and its combination with metformin attenuates renal dysfunction in type-2 diabetic rat model by activating Nrf2 antioxidant pathway
      Ayobami Dare, Mahendra L. Channa, Anand Nadar
      Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 141: 111921.     CrossRef
    • TLR4 Polymorphisms (896A>G and 1196C>T) Affect the Predisposition to Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus


      Narges Khaghanzadeh, Nadereh Naderi, Nazanin Pournasrollah, Elahe Farahbakhsh, Masoumeh Kheirandish, Afshin Samiei
      Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy.2020; Volume 13: 1015.     CrossRef
    • The Hypoglycemic and Renal Protection Properties of Crocin via Oxidative Stress-Regulated NF-κB Signaling in db/db Mice
      Ye Qiu, Xue Jiang, Danping Liu, Zichun Deng, Weiwei Hu, Zhiping Li, Yuxin Li
      Frontiers in Pharmacology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Lipid profiles and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in CKD and diabetes: A nationwide population-based study
      Yeonhee Lee, Sehoon Park, Soojin Lee, Yaerim Kim, Min Woo Kang, Semin Cho, Sanghyun Park, Kyungdo Han, Yong Chul Kim, Seoung Seok Han, Hajeong Lee, Jung Pyo Lee, Kwon Wook Joo, Chun Soo Lim, Yon Su Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Gregory Shearer
      PLOS ONE.2020; 15(4): e0231328.     CrossRef
    • Zingerone produces antidiabetic effects and attenuates diabetic nephropathy by reducing oxidative stress and overexpression of NF-κB, TNF-α, and COX-2 proteins in rats
      Brahmjot Singh, Ajay Kumar, Hasandeep Singh, Sarabjit Kaur, Satwinderjeet Kaur, Harpal Singh Buttar, Saroj Arora, Balbir Singh
      Journal of Functional Foods.2020; 74: 104199.     CrossRef
    • Prevalence and Associated Factors of Dyslipidemia Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia


      Riyadh A Alzaheb, Abdullah H Altemani
      Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy.2020; Volume 13: 4033.     CrossRef
    • Aqueous leaf extract of Clinacanthus nutans improved metabolic indices and sorbitol‐related complications in type II diabetic rats (T2D)
      Mustapha Umar Imam, Maznah Ismail, Annie George, Sasikala M. Chinnappan, Ashril Yusof
      Food Science & Nutrition.2019; 7(4): 1482.     CrossRef
    • Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth Ameliorate Diabetic Nephropathy In Vivo and In Vitro by Inhibiting Advanced Glycation End Product-Activated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
      Nanquan Rao, Xiaotong Wang, Jing Xie, Jingzhi Li, Yue Zhai, Xiaoxia Li, Tengjiaozi Fang, Yuanyuan Wang, Yuming Zhao, Lihong Ge
      Stem Cells International.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
    • The Antidiabetic and Antinephritic Activities of Auricularia cornea (An Albino Mutant Strain) via Modulation of Oxidative Stress in the db/db Mice
      Di Wang, Xue Jiang, Shanshan Teng, Yaqin Zhang, Yang Liu, Xiao Li, Yu Li
      Frontiers in Immunology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The Prevalence and Range of Major Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Iranian Diabetic Adults
      Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh, Fariborz Nikaeen, Mojtaba Akbari, Naser Almasi, Mehrbod Vakhshoori
      SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2019; 1(7): 517.     CrossRef
    • Anti-Diabetic Nephropathy Activities of Polysaccharides Obtained from Termitornyces albuminosus via Regulation of NF-κB Signaling in db/db Mice
      Chang Yang, Qi Feng, Huan Liao, Xinlei Yu, Yang Liu, Di Wang
      International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(20): 5205.     CrossRef
    • Resveratrol exhibits an effect on attenuating retina inflammatory condition and damage of diabetic retinopathy via PON1
      Yuhua Chen, Jiao Meng, Hua Li, Hong Wei, Fangfang Bi, Shi Liu, Kai Tang, Haiyu Guo, Wei Liu
      Experimental Eye Research.2019; 181: 356.     CrossRef
    • Novel aspects of PCSK9 and lipoprotein receptors in renal disease-related dyslipidemia
      Pragyi Shrestha, Bart van de Sluis, Robin P.F. Dullaart, Jacob van den Born
      Cellular Signalling.2019; 55: 53.     CrossRef
    • Plasma triglyceride levels and central obesity predict the development of kidney injury in Chinese community older adults
      Yujie Cao, Guangshan Sun, Rui Liu, Ao Sun, Qian Zhang, Yang Li, Lele Wang, Xiangli Chao, Xiaojie Zhou, Sha Zhang, Ruping Chen
      Renal Failure.2019; 41(1): 946.     CrossRef
    • The Antidiabetic and Antinephritic Activities of Tuber melanosporum via Modulation of Nrf2‐Mediated Oxidative Stress in the db/db Mouse
      Xue Jiang, Shanshan Teng, Xue Wang, Shan Li, Yaqin Zhang, Di Wang, Anderson J. Teodoro
      Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • “Diabetes and Metabolism Disorders Medicinal Plants: A Glance at the Past and a Look to the Future 2018”: Antihyperglycemic Activity of Hamelia patens Jacq. Extracts
      Catalina Rugerio-Escalona, Cynthia Ordaz-Pichardo, Elvia Becerra-Martinez, María del Carmen Cruz-López, Victor E. López-y-López, Aarón Mendieta-Moctezuma, Ignacio E. Maldonado-Mendoza, Fabiola E. Jiménez-Montejo, Akhilesh K. Tamrakar
      Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Spatholobus suberectus Ameliorates Diabetes-Induced Renal Damage by Suppressing Advanced Glycation End Products in db/db Mice
      Moon Ho Do, Jinyoung Hur, Jiwon Choi, Yoonsook Kim, Ho-Young Park, Sang Keun Ha
      International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(9): 2774.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Fiber-Rich Snacks on C-Reactive Protein and Atherogenic Index in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
      Nartyr Sunarti, Sri Lestari Sulistyo Rini, Hemi Sinorita, Dini Ariani
      Romanian Journal of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases.2018; 25(4): 357.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Fiber-Rich Snacks on C-Reactive Protein and Atherogenic Index in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
      Sunarti, Sri Lestari Sulistyo Rini, Hemi Sinorita, Dini Ariani
      Romanian Journal of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases.2018; 25(3): 271.     CrossRef
    • Correlation between Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Calculated, and Measured Lipoproteins: Whether Calculated Small Density Lipoprotein Fraction Predicts Cardiovascular Risks
      Sikandar Hayat Khan, Nadeem Fazal, Athar Abbas Gilani Shah, Syed Mohsin Manzoor, Naveed Asif, Aamir Ijaz, Najmusaqib Khan Niazi, Muhammad Yasir
      Journal of Lipids.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • Cite this Article
      Cite this Article
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Lipid Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Overt Nephropathy
      Diabetes Metab J. 2017;41(2):128-134.   Published online January 11, 2017
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Related articles
    Lipid Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Overt Nephropathy
    Lipid Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Overt Nephropathy
    VariableGroup 1 (n=92)
    Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
    Group 2 (n=89)
    Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
    P value
    Mean age, yr54.28±9.2655.72±10.330.155
    Mean duration of diabetes, yr10.76±7.6112.27±7.040.166
    Sex, male:female70:2261:280.256
    Family history of diabetes42 (45.65)45 (50.56)0.236
    Family history of kidney disease5 (5.43)8 (8.99)0.157
    Retinopathy25 (27.17)32 (35.96)0.185
    Neuropathy20 (21.74)31 (34.83)0.050
    Hypertension45 (48.91)48 (53.93)0.499
    Oral antidiabetic drug60 (65.22)63 (70.79)0.588
    Oral antidiabetic drug+Insulin22 (23.91)20 (22.47)0.537
    Insulin alone10 (10.87)6 (6.74)0.389
    Statin alone29 (31.52)48 (53.93)0.001
    Statin+Ezetimibe-1 (1.12)-
    Statin+Fibrate5 (5.43)3 (3.37)0.144
    ACEi39 (42.39)37 (41.57)1.000
    ARB6 (6.25)11 (12.36)0.491
    VariableGroup 1 (n=92)
    Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
    Group 2 (n=89)
    Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
    95% CI of the differenceP value
    BMI, kg/m227.2±3.626.47±3.18−0.27 to 1.720.15
    HbA1c, %9.54±1.869.4±2.4−0.48 to 0.780.646
    Total cholesterol, mg/dL174.76±36.12211.76±70.27−53.36 to −20.62<0.001
    Triglycerides, mg/dL160.14±84.7189.64±114.71−59 to 0.0090.016
    HDL-C, mg/dL42±15.8640.91±11−5.14 to 2.960.597
    LDL-C, mg/dL101.69±36.5121.18±45.27−31.69 to −7.30.002
    Non-HDL-C, mg/dL135.62±33.66162.63±75.34−44.26 to −9.720.002
    sdLDL4.52±3.935.14±4.13−1.81 to 0.570.104
    Urea, mg/dL32.85±18.1138.05±18.7−10.76 to 0.370.067
    Creatinine, mg/dL1.18±0.521.29±0.58−0.27 to 0.050.203
    eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m285.62±33.6770.21±28.045.97 to 24.850.002
    VariableGroup 1 (n=92)
    Diabetic subjects without nephropathy
    Group 2 (n=89)
    Diabetic subjects with nephropathy
    P value
    Dyslipidemiaa52 (56.52)67 (75.28)0.012
    sdLDLb65 (70.33)67 (75.28)0.772
    Atherogenic dyslipidemiac13 (14.13)13 (14.61)1.0
    Independent variableUnstandardized coefficient BStandard errorP valueR square for the model
    BMI−0.6660.7000.3430.131
    Diabetes duration−0.4550.3530.200
    HbA1c1.0981.1230.330
    Total cholesterol−0.2300.0840.007
    Triglycerides0.0000.0310.993
    HDL-C0.4210.2250.063
    LDL-C0.0530.0900.553
    Table 1 Comparison of the clinical profile of the two groups

    Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

    ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker.

    Table 2 Comparison of anthropometric measurements and biochemical estimations between subjects with and without nephropathy

    Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

    CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; sdLDL, small, dense, LDL; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

    Table 3 Comparison of the occurrence of dyslipidemia between subjects with and without nephropathy

    Values are presented as number (%).

    sdLDL, small, dense, low density lipoprotein.

    aDyslipidemia: total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL or triglycerides (TG) ≥150 mg/dL or high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≤35 mg/dL (for men) and ≤40 mg/dL (for women) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL or a combination of these conditions, bsdLDL: TG/HDL-C ratio >3, cAtherogenic dyslipidemia: TG ≥150 mg/dL+HDL-C ≤35 mg/dL (for men) and ≤40 mg/dL (for women)+sdLDL ratio >3.

    Table 4 Results of multiple linear regression analysis with estimated glomerular filtration rate as dependent variable

    BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

    Palazhy S, Viswanathan V. Lipid Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Overt Nephropathy. Diabetes Metab J. 2017;41(2):128-134.
    Received: Apr 06, 2016; Accepted: Nov 07, 2016
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2017.41.2.128.

    Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
    Close layer
    TOP