Prevalence, Awareness, and Control of Hypertension among Diabetic Koreans

Hyun Hee Chung; Kyu Chang Won

doi:10.4093/dmj.2011.35.4.337

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Diabetes Metab J > Volume 35(4); 2011 > Article

Editorial Prevalence, Awareness, and Control of Hypertension among Diabetic Koreans: Hyun Hee Chung, Kyu Chang Won; Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2011;35(4):337-339.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.4.337
Published online: August 31, 2011

3,113 Views
37 Download
6 Crossref
6 Scopus

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kyu Chang Won. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 317-1 Daemyung-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-717, Korea. kcwon@med.yu.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

NOTES
REFERENCES
About this article

Hypertension affects approximately 70% of patients with diabetes and is approximately twice as common in persons with diabetes as in those without. At the age of 45, around 40% of patients with type 2 diabetes are hypertensive, increasing to 60% by the age of 75 [1]. The overlap between hypertension and diabetes substantially increases the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular disease, retinopathy, and sexual dysfunction. Effective control of blood pressure (BP) has been associated with a reduction in both the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Thus, a major challenge for people with diabetes is the management of hypertension. However, reaching a target level (less than 130/80 mm Hg) of BP control has been difficult to achieve. Studies suggest that many diabetic patients do not achieve target BP control. For example, in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III), 31% of all diabetic patients and nearly 60% of those with previously diagnosed hypertension had a BP >140/90 mm Hg [2,3]. Among elderly diabetic patients seen in an academic medical center, 85% had a BP ≥130/85 mm Hg [4,5]. Berlowitz et al. [6,7] reported that diabetic patients with hypertension received less intensive antihypertensive therapy than patients without diabetes. Using a threshold for hypertension control of ≤140/90 mm Hg, they found that 73% of diabetic hypertensive subjects did not reach this target BP.

Little is known about the prevalence and control of hypertension among patients with diabetes in Korea. Lim et al. [2] reported that the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension in the Korean population was 60.4%. However, that study did not include a recent study of prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension among diabetic Koreans. The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study and the UK Prospective Diabetes Studies (UKPDS) have shown the benefits of achieving tighter BP control [1,8]. In the HOT study, diabetic patients randomized to a target diastolic BP of 80 mm Hg or less had a 50% reduction in major cardiovascular events compared with those with a target diastolic BP of 90 or less [8]. Moreover, the benefits of tight BP control in patients with diabetes exceed the benefits of tight glycemic control and extend not only to the prevention of macrovascular disease, but also to the prevention of microvascular complications [1]. However, in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) BP study, investigators evaluated the potential benefits of targeting a systolic BP level below 120 mm Hg versus a level below 140 mm Hg in patients with type 2 diabetes (34% of whom had cardiovascular disease) [9]. After 4.7 years, there were no significant between-group differences in the annual rate of the primary outcome, a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. Serious adverse events that were attributed to BP medication were more frequent in the intensive-therapy group. As a result of the factorial design of the overall ACCORD study and the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were applied, the study's statistical power was reduced, and the event rate was lower than expected. Thus, the design and results of the ACCORD BP study leave unresolved the issue of the optimal BP target in patients with diabetes. Therefore, lowering systolic BP from the 135mm Hg to around 120 mm Hg does not reduce most cardiovascular events or the rate of death, and most of the benefit from lowering BP is achieved by targeting a goal of less than 140 mm Hg. Compliance is an important factor related to optimal BP control. Shea et al. [10] reported that noncompliance with an antihypertensive regimen was strongly associated with severe and uncontrolled hypertension. Also, in this issue, Seo et al.'s [11] study finds a difference between antihypertensive medication compliance and BP control. It is important to realize that there is still much to be learned about the doctor-patient relationship and its effects on hypertension treatment [10]. Affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system appears particularly useful in diabetic people, certainly for the prevention of poor renal outcomes [12-14]. Calcium channel blockers are recommended in a recent study that suggests favorable outcomes with preservation of the glomerular filtration rate [15]. Thiazide plus cardiospecific beta-blocker combinations are probably undesirable compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors plus calcium channel blockers, but combination alpha/beta-blockers may have particularly desirable characteristics and, in many comparisons, BP levels have not been equal on different regimens. Therefore it becomes uncertain whether different medications or different BP goals are what is being compared [16]. Wong et al.'s [17] study also showed that 80% to 83% of diabetic patients with hypertension received drug therapy, but only 12% to 35% of patients controlled their BP below 130/80 mm Hg, depending on various data sources.

In this issue, Seo et al.'s [11] study results are similar to the findings of other studies. They reported that 57.5% of all patients were over the age of sixty. Their mean HbA1c was 7.6±1.5%. Among antihypertensive medication users, 39.9% had a BP of <130 mm Hg and <80 mm Hg and 60.1% had a BP ≥130 mm Hg or ≥80 mm Hg. The answer "BP is generally felt to be under good control" was given by 75.1% of antihypertensive medication users, and of these patients, 26.4% had a BP of <130 mm Hg and <80 mm Hg and 73.6% had a BP ≥130 mm Hg or ≥80 mm Hg. A total of 75.5% of antihypertensive medication users answered that they had taken antihypertensive medication every day for the most recent 2 weeks. "Forgetfulness" was the most frequent reason given for noncompliance for those who did not regularly take antihypertensive medication. Seo et al.'s [11] study is the first epidemiologic study of prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension among diabetic Koreans. However this study had several limitations. It used survey-based data (interviews and medical records review) and a limited survey questionnaire, and therefore no causal relationships could be precisely delineated. Also, information on duration of diabetes and exact age for diabetic patients was not included this study. In addition, they used subjects from 43 university hospitals in Korea. Therefore, these results cannot be extrapolated to subjects in the general population.

According to Seo et al.'s [11] study, tighter BP control is needed to reduce complications of diabetes in Koreans. Also, we must balance the adverse effects of lowering BP with the benefits of such treatment. Most importantly, we should be aware of the potential for the harmonious interaction of combined glucose and BP lowering.

We appreciate the devotion of study investigators, who are conducting important studies about prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension among diabetic Koreans and hope that expansion on these findings will yield even more useful results in the future.

NOTES

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703-713. Article PubMed PMC
2. Lim S, Kim DJ, Jeong IK, Son HS, Chung CH, Koh G, Lee DH, Won KC, Park JH, Park TS, Ahn J, Kim J, Park KG, Ko SH, Ahn YB, Lee I. A nationwide survey about the current status of glycemic control and complications in diabetic patients in 2006: The Committee of the Korean Diabetes Association on the Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus. Korean Diabetes J 2009;33:48-57.Article
3. Harris MI. Health care and health status and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:754-758. Article PubMed PDF
4. Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, Gregg EW, Thompson TJ, Narayan KM. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:565-574. Article PubMed
5. Chin MH, Su AW, Jin L, Nerney MP. Variations in the care of elderly persons with diabetes among endocrinologists, general internists, and geriatricians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M601-M606. Article PubMed
6. Berlowitz DR, Ash AS, Hickey EC, Glickman M, Friedman R, Kader B. Hypertension management in patients with diabetes: the need for more aggressive therapy. Diabetes Care 2003;26:355-359. PubMed
7. Berlowitz DR, Ash AS, Hickey EC, Friedman RH, Glickman M, Kader B, Moskowitz MA. Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1957-1963. Article PubMed
8. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlof B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, Menard J, Rahn KH, Wedel H, Westerling S. HOT Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998;351:1755-1762. Article PubMed
9. ACCORD Study Group. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Grimm RH Jr, Cutler JA, Simons-Morton DG, Basile JN, Corson MA, Probstfield JL, Katz L, Peterson KA, Friedewald WT, Buse JB, Bigger JT, Gerstein HC, Ismail-Beigi F. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1575-1585. Article PubMed PMC
10. Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, Field L, Francis CK. Predisposing factors for severe, uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority population. N Engl J Med 1992;327:776-781. Article PubMed
11. Seo MH, Lee WJ, Park CY, Kim SR, Park JY, Yoon KH, Lee MK, Park SW. Management of blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide survey in Korean. Diabetes Metab J 2011;35:348-353.Article PubMed PMC
12. Persson F, Rossing P, Reinhard H, Juhl T, Stehouwer CD, Schalkwijk C, Danser AH, Boomsma F, Frandsen E, Parving HH. Renal effects of aliskiren compared with and in combination with irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1873-1879. Article PubMed PMC PDF
13. ONTARGET Investigators. Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I, Schumacher H, Dagenais G, Sleight P, Anderson C. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1547-1559. Article PubMed
14. Bloomgarden ZT, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Rayfield EJ, Bookman J, Brown WV. Elevated hemoglobin A1c and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in thiazide-treated diabetic patients. Am J Med 1984;77:823-827. Article PubMed
15. Bakris GL, Toto RD, McCullough PA, Rocha R, Purkayastha D, Davis P. GUARD (Gauging Albuminuria Reduction With Lotrel in Diabetic Patients With Hypertension) Study Investigators. Effects of different ACE inhibitor combinations on albuminuria: results of the GUARD study. Kidney Int 2008;73:1303-1309. Article PubMed
16. Ostergren J, Poulter NR, Sever PS, Dahlof B, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E. ASCOT investigators. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: blood pressure-lowering limb: effects in patients with type II diabetes. J Hypertens 2008;26:2103-2111. Article PubMed
17. Wong ND, Lopez VA, L'Italien G, Chen R, Kline SE, Franklin SS. Inadequate control of hypertension in US adults with cardiovascular disease comorbidities in 2003-2004. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2431-2436. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The practice of consanguineous marriage and the risk of diabetes among offspring in the province of Tetouan (Morocco)
Mohamed Hajjaji, AbdErrazzak Khadmaoui, Mohamed El Bakkali
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research.2024; 42(1): 30. CrossRef
ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes: Recommendations from the 2024 Egyptian Cardiology Expert Consensus in Collaboration with the CVREP Foundation
Mohamed Sobhy, Adel Eletriby, Hany Ragy, Hossam Kandil, Mohamed Ayman Saleh, Nabil Farag, Ramez Guindy, Ahmed Bendary, Ahmed Mohamed Elmahmoudy Nayel, Ahmed Shawky, Ayman Khairy, Ayman Mortada, Bassem Zarif, Haitham Badran, Hazem Khorshid, Kareem Mahmoud,
Cardiology and Therapy.2024; 13(4): 707. CrossRef
Insulin Resistance and Hypertension among Type 2 Diabetes Subjects in a Tertiary Institution in South East Nigeria
Michael Chinweuba Abonyi, Ekenechukwu Esther Young, Chidinma Brenda Nwatu, Chidiebere Valentine Ugwueze, Marcellinus Okafor Nkpozi, Uzoma Chukwunonso Okechukwu, Maryann Kanayo Oham, John Aniebo Maluze, Fintan Chinweike Ekochin, Ginikachi Ginikachi Ucheze
Nigerian Journal of Medicine.2023; 32(4): 422. CrossRef
The prevalence of hypertension and its progression among patients with type 2 diabetes in Jordan
Ahlam Bani Salameh, Dana Hyassat, Ahmad Suhail, Zaina Makahleh, Yousef Khader, Mohammed EL-Khateeb, Kamel Ajlouni
Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2022; 73: 103162. CrossRef
Gender dependent effects of fasting blood glucose levels and disease duration on biochemical markers in type 2 diabetics: A pilot study
Abhijit A. Ghadge, Arundhati G. Diwan, Abhay M. Harsulkar, Aniket A. Kuvalekar
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.2017; 11: S481. CrossRef
Understanding Epistatic Interactions between Genes Targeted by Non-coding Regulatory Elements in Complex Diseases
Min Kyung Sung, Hyoeun Bang, Jung Kyoon Choi
Genomics & Informatics.2014; 12(4): 181. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format: