Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Search
OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Diabetes Metab J > Ahead-of print > Article
Original Article
Metabolic Risk/Epidemiology Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Ji-Hee Sung1*orcid, Kyung-Soo Kim2*orcid, Kyungdo Han3, Cheol-Young Park4orcidcorresp_icon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2023.0444
Published online: August 19, 2024
  • 556 Views
  • 45 Download

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

3Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea

4Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

corresp_icon Corresponding author: Cheol-Young Park Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03181, Korea E-mail: cydoctor@chol.com
*Ji-Hee Sung and Kyung-Soo Kim contributed equally to this study as first authors.
• Received: December 8, 2023   • Accepted: June 17, 2024

Copyright © 2024 Korean Diabetes Association

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Background
    We investigated the association between uterine leiomyoma (UL) and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in young women.
  • Methods
    A nationwide population-based cohort study of 2,541,550 women aged between 20 and 40 years was performed using the National Health Information Database. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the risk of incident T2DM according to the presence of UL and myomectomy.
  • Results
    The mean age was 29.70 years, and mean body mass index was 21.31 kg/m2. Among 2,541,550 participants, 18,375 (0.72%) women had UL. During a median 7.45 years of follow-up, 23,829 women (0.94%) were diagnosed with T2DM. The incidence of T2DM in women with UL (1.805/1,000 person-years) was higher than in those without UL (1.289/1,000 person-years). Compared with women without UL, women with UL had a higher risk of incident T2DM (hazard ratio, 1.216; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.071 to 1.382). Women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy had a 1.505 times (95% CI, 1.297 to 1.748) higher risk for incident T2DM than women without UL. However, women with UL who underwent myomectomy did not have increased risk for incident T2DM.
  • Conclusion
    Young women with UL were associated with a high risk of incident T2DM. In addition, myomectomy seemed to attenuate the risk for incident T2DM in young women with UL.
• Young women with UL were associated with a high risk of incident T2DM.
• Myomectomy seemed to attenuate the risk for incident T2DM in young women with UL.
• T2DM screening and prevention may reduce the risk of T2DM in young women with UL.
Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is one of the most common benign tumors of the uterus in reproductive age women [1,2]. UL is often asymptomatic and rarely becomes malignant; however, it may cause pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, excessive uterine bleeding, and infertility in women of reproductive age. Old age, younger age at menarche, and premenopausal state are risk factors for developing UL, as it is linked to longer duration of exposure to ovarian hormones [3,4].
The prevalence and incidence of UL has recently been gradually increasing in young women [5]. Many studies have reported that UL was associated with metabolic disorders [6-9]. A study found that metabolic syndrome and each of their components were associated with an increased prevalence of UL [6]. Insulin resistance was suggested as one of the possible pathophysiological explanations for UL development [10,11]. Hyperinsulinemia induced by insulin resistance can upregulate serum insulin-like growth factor-1 and epidermal growth factor levels [12-14]. This can affect the development of UL by enhancing either ovarian hormone secretion or myometrial smooth muscle cell proliferation, or both. Since insulin resistance is associated with UL, women with UL may be at increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which has insulin resistance as its main pathophysiology. However, no studies have investigated whether UL have associated with incident T2DM, especially in young women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UL and incident T2DM in young women using a nationwide population-based cohort.
Data source
We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using claims and health checkup data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). The NHIS is a single-payer health care system for all Korean residents managed by the Korean government, covering more than 98% of the Korean population. The claims data encompasses sociodemographic variables, diagnosis statements defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), prescriptions, and hospital visits dates. Our study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kangbuk Samsung hospital (KBSMC-07-034). Informed consent was waived by IRB as the data set provided from NHIS is deidentified to protect privacy.
Study design and participants
We selected 2,755,790 women aged between 20 and 40 years at baseline who underwent at least one health checkup between 2009 and 2012. The time point at the first health checkup for each patient between 2009 and 2012 was considered the index date. We excluded those who were previously diagnosed with T2DM (n=28,136), those who had hysterectomy during the study period (n=18,485), and those with missing variable for analysis (n=166,012). To overcome bias, we also excluded those who those diagnosed with T2DM within the first year of entry (1-year lag-period; n=1,607). Finally, a total of 2,541,550 patients were eligible for inclusion and were followed until December 31, 2018.
Measurements
Blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic values) was measured by a trained clinician while the participants were seated. Blood samples were obtained after at least 8 hours of fasting. The levels of glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and creatinine were measured. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study: eGFR=186.3×serum creatinine−1.154×age−0.203×0.742 (for women).
Information about lifestyle factors, including smoking status, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise was obtained using a standardized self-assessment questionnaire. Drinking status was divided into three categories: nondrinker, mild drinker, and heavy drinker. Heavy drinker was defined as drinking more than 30 g of alcohol per day and mild drinker was defined as drinking less than 30 g of alcohol per day. Regular exercise was defined as more than 30 minutes of moderate intensity activity performed at least five times per week, or more than 20 minutes of high intensity activity performed at least three times per week. Low income was defined as being within the lowest 20% of the total population-based on monthly income.
Definitions
UL was identified in case of female patient admittance with ICD-10 code D25 at least once or diagnosis with ICD-10 codes D25 upon outpatient clinic visit at least twice within one year from the index date. Myomectomy was defined as an ICD-10 code for myomectomy (QZ961, R4120-4126, R4130, R4141, R4145, R4146, RZ564-566, HA636, HA621, M6644) logged within 1 year of the index date.
Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or having been prescribed anti-hypertensive drugs under ICD-10 codes I10–13, I15. Dyslipidemia was defined using ICD-10 codes E78 and at least one record per year for a prescription for a lipid-lowering agent or by a total cholesterol level ≥240 mg/dL. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 100 to 125 mg/dL, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. T2DM was defined as having FPG ≥126 mg/dL or having been prescribed anti-diabetic drugs under ICD-10 codes E11–E14.
Study outcomes and follow-up
The primary outcome was the incidence of T2DM. The study population was followed from the index date to the date of incident T2DM, or until December 31, 2018 whichever came first. The median follow-up duration was 7.45 years.
Statistical analyses
Continuous variables are presented as mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range), while categorical variables are presented as numbers (%). Baseline clinical characteristics were compared between groups using Student’s t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Incidence rates are presented as the number of events occurring per 1,000 person-years. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for T2DM. Model 1 was adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and regular exercise. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI). The cumulative incidence of T2DM according to the presence of UL and myomectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method after adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, BMI, and eGFR. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, and having hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CKD. All data analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A P<0.05 was considered significant.
Baseline characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1. A total of 2,541,550 women were eligible, of whom 18,375 (0.72%) were diagnosed with UL. The mean age was 29.70 years, and mean BMI was 21.31 kg/m2. Women with UL were older, less likely to be current smokers and heavy drinkers, less likely to have low household income, and more likely to have hypertension, dyslipidemia, and IFG than those without UL. In addition, the BMI, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), FPG, total cholesterol, TG, and LDL cholesterol were elevated, while HDL cholesterol was decreased in women with UL. There were no significant differences between women with UL and those without UL with respect to the percentages of patients who undertook regular exercise and who had CKD.
Over a median 7.45 years of follow-up, 23,829 women (0.94%) were diagnosed with T2DM (Table 2). The incidence rate of T2DM in women with UL (1.805/1,000 person-years) was higher than that in those without UL (1.289/1,000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of T2DM in women with UL was higher than that in those without UL (P<0.001) (Fig. 1A). The unadjusted HR for incident T2DM in women with UL was 1.403 (95% CI, 1.236 to 1.593). Although the HR for incident T2DM was slightly decreased after adjustment for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise (model 1), women with UL still showed an elevated HR for incident T2DM (HR, 1.195; 95% CI, 1.053 to 1.358). In multivariable-adjusted model (model 2), the HR for incident T2DM in women with UL was 1.216 (95% CI, 1.071 to 1.382).
Women with UL who underwent myomectomy were older and had higher BMI than those with UL who did not undergo myomectomy (Supplementary Table 1). There was no significant difference in other baseline characteristics between women with UL who underwent myomectomy and those with UL who did not undergo myomectomy. Compared with women without UL, women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy had a 1.505 times (95% CI, 1.297 to 1.748) higher risk for incident T2DM, as opposed to no increased risk in those with UL who underwent myomectomy (Table 2). Women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy still had an elevated HR for incident T2DM (HR, 1.287; 95% CI, 1.108 to 1.495) after adjustment for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and regular exercise (model 1). In the multivariable-adjusted model (model 2), the HR for incident T2DM in women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy was 1.328 (95% CI, 1.143 to 1.542). However, the risk for T2DM was not increased in women with UL who underwent myomectomy after adjustment for aforementioned factors (model 1 and model 2). The cumulative incidence of T2DM in women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy was higher than that in those with UL who underwent myomectomy (P<0.001) (Fig. 1B).
Subgroup analyses stratified by age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CKD were performed (Table 3). Women with UL showed a higher risk for incident T2DM than women without UL in almost all subgroups, except in those with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 or those with CKD.
This nationwide population-based cohort study demonstrated that young women with UL were associated with a high risk of incident T2DM. Incidence rate of T2DM in women with UL was higher than that in women without UL. Interestingly, women with UL who underwent myomectomy did not have an increased risk for incident T2DM compared with those without UL. However, in women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy, the risk for incident T2DM was higher than that in those without UL. To our knowledge, this was the first study to evaluate the association between UL and incident T2DM in young women using a nationwide population-based cohort.
Many studies have shown that UL was associated with obesity and metabolic disorders [2,6-9]. An observational case-control study including 71 women of childbearing age diagnosed with UL and 145 women as control group, preperitoneal fat thickness showed an independent association with the presence of UL [7]. Another study, including 89 patients with UL and 81 healthy women without UL, showed that increased body fat (especially abdominal visceral fat) is associated with an increased risk of UL [8]. Recently, a meta-analysis examining 24 studies found a positive association between obesity and the risk/prevalence of UL (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.29) [2]. Takeda et al. [9] have reported that BMI, blood pressure, TG, and FPG were significantly higher in 213 women with UL compared to those in 159 women without UL and the risk of UL was correlated with increased metabolic component levels. Other study that enrolled 1,230 parous premenopausal women reported that women with UL had higher waist circumferences, body fat, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol than women without UL [6]. In our study, women with UL had poor metabolic profiles, such as higher blood pressure, FPG, total cholesterol, TG, LDL cholesterol, and lower HDL cholesterol compared with women without UL.
However, few studies have evaluated the association between UL and T2DM. Aforementioned study enrolled 1,230 parous premenopausal women revealed that hyperglycemia is significantly associated with an increased risk of UL (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.89) [6]. In a Taiwanese population-based cohort study, metformin use was associated with a low risk of UL in 21,996 women with new-onset T2DM (HR, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.387 to 0.564) [15]. On the other hand, a nested case-control study enrolling 3,789 participants reported a protective association between UL and T2DM, but it was a cross-sectional design that included relatively old women (mean age, 47 years in UL group; 44 years in control group) [16]. In our study, women with UL had 21.6% higher risk for incident T2DM compared with those without UL. The strength of our study was that it was a longitudinal design over a median 7.45 years of follow-up and more than 2 millions women were enrolled, which made it much larger than in the aforementioned studies.
The pathophysiology of how UL affects the development of T2DM is unclear. Along with estrogen, progesterone and progesterone receptors are reported to play a key role in the development and growth of UL [17]. Increased progesterone level is associated with reduced insulin sensitivity, which can lead to development of T2DM [18,19]. Although insulin sensitivity may be reduced by the effect of progesterone in women with UL, it is difficult to determine whether there is a casual relationship between the presence of UL and development of T2DM. As there is a possibility that reduced insulin sensitivity is a common risk factor for the development of T2DM and UL. However, an animal study showing improved glucose homeostasis in progesterone receptor knockout mice supports the adverse effect of progesterone on glucose tolerance and insulin release [20]. In our study, women with UL who underwent myomectomy did not have an increased risk for incident T2DM compared with those without UL, whereas women with UL who did not undergo myomectomy still had a high risk for incident T2DM. A possible mechanism for the reduction of incident T2DM risk associated with myomectomy may be due to the reduction of progesterone receptor expression through the mechanical removal of UL.
In subgroup analysis stratified by BMI, women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 revealed no significant difference in the risk of incident T2DM between women with UL and without UL. Similarly, there was no difference in the risk of incident T2DM between women with UL and without UL in women with CKD. This might be because obesity and CKD have been already strong risk factors for T2DM [21-23]. Relatively higher incidence rate of T2DM in women with obesity or CKD than those without obesity or CKD support this hypothesis (Table 3). In addition, when we analyzed in women without obesity or CKD, the results were similar with main study (Supplementary Table 2). Women aged more than 30 years tended to have no significant difference in the risk of incident T2DM between women with UL and without UL. Old age is also very strong risk factor for T2DM [24,25]. Because women more than 30 years had already higher incidence rate of T2DM than women less than 30 years, there may have been no difference in the risk of incident T2DM between women with UL and without UL in women more than 30 years. Meanwhile, UL tended to associated with an increased risk for incident T2DM even in women without hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CKD. Because one of the major risk factors for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CKD is insulin resistance [26,27], we could assume that UL itself increases the risk of T2DM through mechanisms other than insulin resistance. Further prospective study is warranted to determine the association between UL and incident T2DM.
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. First, since UL is mostly asymptomatic in early stages, women who have asymptomatic UL may have been undiagnosed. Second, information about the size and number of ULs was not available due to the database characteristics. Third, gynecologic information, including parity, presence of polycystic ovarian syndrome, or hormonal status, were also inaccessible; these factors can affect the development of T2DM, and their absence lowers the generalizability of our results. Fourth, we could not get the information on various insulin resistance indices due to limitation of database. Finally, because this study was conducted using the Korean nationwide database, the results should be interpreted with caution when applied to other ethnicities. This study was nonetheless valuable because it was the first large-scale, longitudinal study to evaluate the association between UL and the risk of incident T2DM in young women.
In conclusion, young women with UL were associated with a high risk of incident T2DM. Furthermore, myomectomy seemed to attenuate the risk for incident T2DM in young women with UL. This study suggests that T2DM screening and prevention might be helpful to reduce the risk of incident T2DM in young women with UL.
Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2023.0444.
Supplementary Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of women with uterine leiomyoma according to myomectomy
dmj-2023-0444-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf
Supplementary Table 2.
The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma and myomectomy in women without obesity or chronic kidney disease
dmj-2023-0444-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception or design: J.H.S., K.S.K., C.Y.P.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: all authors.

Drafting the work or revising: J.H.S., K.S.K., C.Y.P.

Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

FUNDING

None

Acknowledgements
None
Fig. 1.
The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. (A) Stratified according to presence of uterine leiomyoma adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001). (B) Stratified according to myomectomy adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001).
dmj-2023-0444f1.jpg
dmj-2023-0444f2.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of participants according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma
Characteristic Total Uterine leiomyoma (–) Uterine leiomyoma (+) P value
Number 2,541,550 2,523,175 18,375
Age, yr 29.70±5.21 29.68±5.21 32.64±4.23 <0.0001
Body mass index, kg/m2 21.31±3.20 21.31±3.20 21.65±3.14 <0.0001
 <18.5 379,116 (14.92) 377,119 (14.95) 1,997 (10.87) <0.0001
 18.5–22.9 1,576,544 (62.03) 1,565,008 (62.03) 11,536 (62.78)
 23.0–24.9 294,578 (11.59) 292,090 (11.58) 2,488 (13.54)
 25.0–29.9 235,692 (9.27) 233,741 (9.26) 1,951 (10.62)
 ≥30.0 55,620 (2.19) 55,217 (2.19) 403 (2.19)
Smoking status 0.0001
 Nonsmoker 2,299,714 (90.48) 2,283,039 (90.48) 16,675 (90.75)
 Ex-smoker 91,279 (3.59) 90,556 (3.59) 723 (3.93)
 Current smoker 150,557 (5.92) 149,580 (5.93) 977 (5.32)
Drinking <0.0001
 None 1,383,812 (54.45) 1,373,170 (54.42) 10,642 (57.92)
 Mild (≤30 g/day) 1,096,920 (43.16) 1,089,508 (43.18) 7,412 (40.34)
 Heavy (>30 g/day) 60,818 (2.39) 60,497 (2.40) 321 (1.75)
Regular exercise 242,253 (9.53) 240,517 (9.53) 1,736 (9.45) 0.6969
Low income 550,756 (21.67) 547,465 (21.70) 3,291 (17.91) <0.0001
Hypertension 56,199 (2.21) 55,635 (2.20) 564 (3.07) <0.0001
Dyslipidemia 89,979 (3.54) 89,176 (3.53) 803 (4.37) <0.0001
Impaired fasting glucose 253,331 (9.97) 251,346 (9.96) 1,985 (10.80) 0.0001
Chronic kidney disease 69,812 (2.75) 69,314 (2.75) 498 (2.71) 0.7605
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 111.15±11.46 111.15±11.46 111.94±11.82 <0.0001
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 69.79±8.49 69.78±8.49 70.24±8.68 <0.0001
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 98.30±41.33 98.30±41.28 98.41±47.86 0.7107
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL 87.49±9.72 87.49±9.72 87.89±9.76 <0.0001
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 177.78±30.67 177.76±30.66 180.63±31.29 <0.0001
Triglyceride, mg/dL 71.57 (71.52–71.61) 71.54 (71.50–71.58) 75.17 (74.66–75.69) <0.0001
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 63.29±23.58 63.29±23.60 62.09±20.42 <0.0001
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL 99.08±30.77 99.06±30.77 102.01±31.03 <0.0001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.

Table 2.
The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma and myomectomy
Variable Number Event Person-years Incidence ratea Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)
Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2
Uterine leiomyoma (–) 2,523,175 23,589 18,294,853.90 1.289 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Uterine leiomyoma (+) 18,375 240 132,968.5 1.805 1.403 (1.236–1.593) 1.195 (1.053–1.358) 1.216 (1.071–1.382)
 Myomectomy (–) 12,411 173 89,638.8 1.930 1.505 (1.297–1.748) 1.287 (1.108–1.495) 1.328 (1.143–1.542)
 Myomectomy (+) 5,964 67 43,329.7 1.546 1.198 (0.942–1.522) 1.009 (0.794–1.283) 1.000 (0.787–1.271)

Model 1: adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise. Model 2: adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index.

a Incidence per 1,000 person-years.

Table 3.
Subgroup analysis for the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma
Variable Uterine leiomyoma Number Event Person-years Incidence ratea Hazard ratiob (95% confidence interval) P for interaction
Age, yr
 <30 No 1,319,445 9,013 9,553,990.4 0.943 1 (reference) 0.1468
Yes 4,764 53 34,841.5 1.521 1.482 (1.131–1.942)
 ≥30 No 1,203,730 14,576 8,740,863.5 1.668 1 (reference)
Yes 13,611 187 98,127.0 1.906 1.147 (0.993–1.325)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 <25 No 2,234,217 10,603 16,252,479.1 0.652 1 (reference) 0.0006
Yes 16,021 131 116,396.1 1.125 1.445 (1.216–1.717)
 ≥25 No 288,958 12,986 2,042,374.8 6.358 1 (reference)
Yes 2,354 109 16,572.4 6.577 0.992 (0.822–1.198)
Smoking status
 Nonsmoker No 2,283,039 20,207 16,594,430.0 1.218 1 (reference) 0.9382
Yes 16,675 207 121,111.1 1.709 1.216 (1.060–1.395)
 Ex-smoker No 90,556 1,099 646,608.2 1.700 1 (reference)
Yes 723 12 5,082.3 2.361 1.224 (0.692–2.164)
 Current smoker No 149,580 2,283 1,053,815.7 2.166 1 (reference)
Yes 977 21 6,775.2 3.100 1.274 (0.828–1.959)
Alcohol consumption
 None No 1,373,170 13,486 9,994,329.4 1.349 1 (reference) 0.1123
Yes 10,642 136 77,196.5 1.762 1.125 (0.950–1.332)
 Mild (≤30 g/day) No 1,089,508 9,380 7,870,055.0 1.192 1 (reference)
Yes 7,412 94 53,509.7 1.757 1.266 (1.033–1.552)
 Heavy (>30 g/day) No 60,497 723 430,469.4 1.680 1 (reference)
Yes 321 10 2,262.3 4.420 1.909 (1.021–3.569)
Regular exercise
 No No 2,282,658 20,712 16,550,721.7 1.251 1 (reference) 0.3820
Yes 16,639 214 120,396.0 1.777 1.235 (1.079–1.413)
 Yes No 240,517 2,877 1,744,132.2 1.650 1 (reference)
Yes 1,736 26 12,572.5 2.068 1.115 (0.758–1.641)
Hypertension
 No No 2,467,540 20,935 17,899,433.2 1.170 1 (reference) 0.9794
Yes 17,811 208 129,026.1 1.612 1.212 (1.057–1.389)
 Yes No 55,635 2,654 395,420.7 6.712 1 (reference)
Yes 564 32 3,942.4 8.117 1.237 (0.873–1.753)
Dyslipidemia
 No No 2,433,999 20,894 17,652,583.3 1.184 1 (reference) 0.0830
Yes 17,572 217 127,240.1 1.705 1.266 (1.107–1.448)
 Yes No 89,176 2,695 642,270.6 4.196 1 (reference)
Yes 803 23 5,728.4 4.015 0.893 (0.592–1.347)
Chronic kidney disease
 No No 2,453,861 22,717 17,756,239.8 1.279 1 (reference) 0.0160
Yes 17,877 232 129,107.8 1.797 1.228 (1.079–1.397)
 Yes No 69,314 872 538,614.1 1.619 1 (reference)
Yes 498 8 3,860.7 2.072 1.125 (0.560–2.258)

a Incidence per 1,000 person-years,

b Adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index.

  • 1. Management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: ACOG practice bulletin, number 228. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:e100-15.PubMed
  • 2. Qin H, Lin Z, Vasquez E, Luan X, Guo F, Xu L. Association between obesity and the risk of uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2021;75:197-204.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Giuliani E, As-Sanie S, Marsh EE. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;149:3-9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 4. Kim JJ, Kurita T, Bulun SE. Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer. Endocr Rev 2013;34:130-62.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Lee M, Chung YJ, Kim HK, Hwang H, Park JY, Shin I, et al. Estimated prevalence and incidence of uterine leiomyoma, and its treatment trend in South Korean women for 12 years: a national population-based study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021;30:1038-46.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Tak YJ, Lee SY, Park SK, Kim YJ, Lee JG, Jeong DW, et al. Association between uterine leiomyoma and metabolic syndrome in parous premenopausal women: a case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e5325.PubMedPMC
  • 7. Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Moriconi L, Clemente N, Orici F, Boschi AC, et al. The association between ultrasound-estimated visceral fat deposition and uterine fibroids: an observational study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:634-7.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Sun K, Xie Y, Zhao N, Li Z. A case-control study of the relationship between visceral fat and development of uterine fibroids. Exp Ther Med 2019;18:404-10.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Takeda T, Sakata M, Isobe A, Miyake A, Nishimoto F, Ota Y, et al. Relationship between metabolic syndrome and uterine leiomyomas: a case-control study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;66:14-7.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 10. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005;365:1415-28.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Hebbar S, Chaya V, Rai L, Ramachandran A. Factors influencing endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:608-14.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. Januzzi JL Jr, Butler J, Sattar N, Xu J, Shaw W, Rosenthal N, et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 predicts renal and cardiovascular outcomes in the canagliflozin cardiovascular assessment study. Diabetes Care 2021;44:210-6.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 13. Yang Y, Yao S, Ding JM, Chen W, Guo Y. Enhancer-gene interaction analyses identified the epidermal growth factor receptor as a susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:241-50.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 14. Jeong IK, Byun JK, Noh J, Kim SW, Chung YS, Park TS, et al. Reference ranges of serum insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3: results from a multicenter study in healthy Korean adults. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:954-9.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 15. Tseng CH. Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of uterine leiomyoma in female type 2 diabetes patients. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2019;10:2042018819895159.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 16. Chiang CH, Chen W, Tsai IJ, Hsu CY, Wang JH, Lin SZ, et al. Diabetes mellitus risk after hysterectomy: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e24468.PubMedPMC
  • 17. Brandon DD, Bethea CL, Strawn EY, Novy MJ, Burry KA, Harrington MS, et al. Progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein are overexpressed in human uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:78-85.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Padmanabhan S, Lee VW, Mclean M, Athayde N, Lanzarone V, Khoshnow Q, et al. The association of falling insulin requirements with maternal biomarkers and placental dysfunction: a prospective study of women with preexisting diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1323-30.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Ryan AS, Nicklas BJ, Berman DM. Hormone replacement therapy, insulin sensitivity, and abdominal obesity in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 2002;25:127-33.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Picard F, Wanatabe M, Schoonjans K, Lydon J, O’Malley BW, Auwerx J. Progesterone receptor knockout mice have an improved glucose homeostasis secondary to beta-cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:15644-8.PubMedPMC
  • 21. Moon JH, Jang Y, Oh TJ, Jung SY. The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to changes in obesity status in late middle-aged adults: a nationwide cohort study of Korea. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:514-22.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 22. Kim KS, Park SW, Cho YW, Kim SK. Higher prevalence and progression rate of chronic kidney disease in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 2018;42:224-32.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 23. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 11. Chronic kidney disease and risk management: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47(Suppl 1):S219-30.PubMed
  • 24. Ko SH, Han KD, Park YM, Yun JS, Kim K, Bae JH, et al. Diabetes mellitus in the elderly adults in Korea: based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019 to 2020. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:643-52.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 25. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 13. Older adults: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47(Suppl 1):S244-57.PubMed
  • 26. Choi JH, Lee KA, Moon JH, Chon S, Kim DJ, Kim HJ, et al. 2023 Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus of the Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:575-94.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 27. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47(Suppl 1):S158-78.PubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite this Article
        Cite this Article
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      Related articles
      Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study
      Image Image
      Fig. 1. The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. (A) Stratified according to presence of uterine leiomyoma adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001). (B) Stratified according to myomectomy adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001).
      Graphical abstract
      Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study
      Characteristic Total Uterine leiomyoma (–) Uterine leiomyoma (+) P value
      Number 2,541,550 2,523,175 18,375
      Age, yr 29.70±5.21 29.68±5.21 32.64±4.23 <0.0001
      Body mass index, kg/m2 21.31±3.20 21.31±3.20 21.65±3.14 <0.0001
       <18.5 379,116 (14.92) 377,119 (14.95) 1,997 (10.87) <0.0001
       18.5–22.9 1,576,544 (62.03) 1,565,008 (62.03) 11,536 (62.78)
       23.0–24.9 294,578 (11.59) 292,090 (11.58) 2,488 (13.54)
       25.0–29.9 235,692 (9.27) 233,741 (9.26) 1,951 (10.62)
       ≥30.0 55,620 (2.19) 55,217 (2.19) 403 (2.19)
      Smoking status 0.0001
       Nonsmoker 2,299,714 (90.48) 2,283,039 (90.48) 16,675 (90.75)
       Ex-smoker 91,279 (3.59) 90,556 (3.59) 723 (3.93)
       Current smoker 150,557 (5.92) 149,580 (5.93) 977 (5.32)
      Drinking <0.0001
       None 1,383,812 (54.45) 1,373,170 (54.42) 10,642 (57.92)
       Mild (≤30 g/day) 1,096,920 (43.16) 1,089,508 (43.18) 7,412 (40.34)
       Heavy (>30 g/day) 60,818 (2.39) 60,497 (2.40) 321 (1.75)
      Regular exercise 242,253 (9.53) 240,517 (9.53) 1,736 (9.45) 0.6969
      Low income 550,756 (21.67) 547,465 (21.70) 3,291 (17.91) <0.0001
      Hypertension 56,199 (2.21) 55,635 (2.20) 564 (3.07) <0.0001
      Dyslipidemia 89,979 (3.54) 89,176 (3.53) 803 (4.37) <0.0001
      Impaired fasting glucose 253,331 (9.97) 251,346 (9.96) 1,985 (10.80) 0.0001
      Chronic kidney disease 69,812 (2.75) 69,314 (2.75) 498 (2.71) 0.7605
      Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 111.15±11.46 111.15±11.46 111.94±11.82 <0.0001
      Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 69.79±8.49 69.78±8.49 70.24±8.68 <0.0001
      eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 98.30±41.33 98.30±41.28 98.41±47.86 0.7107
      Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL 87.49±9.72 87.49±9.72 87.89±9.76 <0.0001
      Total cholesterol, mg/dL 177.78±30.67 177.76±30.66 180.63±31.29 <0.0001
      Triglyceride, mg/dL 71.57 (71.52–71.61) 71.54 (71.50–71.58) 75.17 (74.66–75.69) <0.0001
      HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 63.29±23.58 63.29±23.60 62.09±20.42 <0.0001
      LDL cholesterol, mg/dL 99.08±30.77 99.06±30.77 102.01±31.03 <0.0001
      Variable Number Event Person-years Incidence ratea Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)
      Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2
      Uterine leiomyoma (–) 2,523,175 23,589 18,294,853.90 1.289 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
      Uterine leiomyoma (+) 18,375 240 132,968.5 1.805 1.403 (1.236–1.593) 1.195 (1.053–1.358) 1.216 (1.071–1.382)
       Myomectomy (–) 12,411 173 89,638.8 1.930 1.505 (1.297–1.748) 1.287 (1.108–1.495) 1.328 (1.143–1.542)
       Myomectomy (+) 5,964 67 43,329.7 1.546 1.198 (0.942–1.522) 1.009 (0.794–1.283) 1.000 (0.787–1.271)
      Variable Uterine leiomyoma Number Event Person-years Incidence ratea Hazard ratiob (95% confidence interval) P for interaction
      Age, yr
       <30 No 1,319,445 9,013 9,553,990.4 0.943 1 (reference) 0.1468
      Yes 4,764 53 34,841.5 1.521 1.482 (1.131–1.942)
       ≥30 No 1,203,730 14,576 8,740,863.5 1.668 1 (reference)
      Yes 13,611 187 98,127.0 1.906 1.147 (0.993–1.325)
      Body mass index, kg/m2
       <25 No 2,234,217 10,603 16,252,479.1 0.652 1 (reference) 0.0006
      Yes 16,021 131 116,396.1 1.125 1.445 (1.216–1.717)
       ≥25 No 288,958 12,986 2,042,374.8 6.358 1 (reference)
      Yes 2,354 109 16,572.4 6.577 0.992 (0.822–1.198)
      Smoking status
       Nonsmoker No 2,283,039 20,207 16,594,430.0 1.218 1 (reference) 0.9382
      Yes 16,675 207 121,111.1 1.709 1.216 (1.060–1.395)
       Ex-smoker No 90,556 1,099 646,608.2 1.700 1 (reference)
      Yes 723 12 5,082.3 2.361 1.224 (0.692–2.164)
       Current smoker No 149,580 2,283 1,053,815.7 2.166 1 (reference)
      Yes 977 21 6,775.2 3.100 1.274 (0.828–1.959)
      Alcohol consumption
       None No 1,373,170 13,486 9,994,329.4 1.349 1 (reference) 0.1123
      Yes 10,642 136 77,196.5 1.762 1.125 (0.950–1.332)
       Mild (≤30 g/day) No 1,089,508 9,380 7,870,055.0 1.192 1 (reference)
      Yes 7,412 94 53,509.7 1.757 1.266 (1.033–1.552)
       Heavy (>30 g/day) No 60,497 723 430,469.4 1.680 1 (reference)
      Yes 321 10 2,262.3 4.420 1.909 (1.021–3.569)
      Regular exercise
       No No 2,282,658 20,712 16,550,721.7 1.251 1 (reference) 0.3820
      Yes 16,639 214 120,396.0 1.777 1.235 (1.079–1.413)
       Yes No 240,517 2,877 1,744,132.2 1.650 1 (reference)
      Yes 1,736 26 12,572.5 2.068 1.115 (0.758–1.641)
      Hypertension
       No No 2,467,540 20,935 17,899,433.2 1.170 1 (reference) 0.9794
      Yes 17,811 208 129,026.1 1.612 1.212 (1.057–1.389)
       Yes No 55,635 2,654 395,420.7 6.712 1 (reference)
      Yes 564 32 3,942.4 8.117 1.237 (0.873–1.753)
      Dyslipidemia
       No No 2,433,999 20,894 17,652,583.3 1.184 1 (reference) 0.0830
      Yes 17,572 217 127,240.1 1.705 1.266 (1.107–1.448)
       Yes No 89,176 2,695 642,270.6 4.196 1 (reference)
      Yes 803 23 5,728.4 4.015 0.893 (0.592–1.347)
      Chronic kidney disease
       No No 2,453,861 22,717 17,756,239.8 1.279 1 (reference) 0.0160
      Yes 17,877 232 129,107.8 1.797 1.228 (1.079–1.397)
       Yes No 69,314 872 538,614.1 1.619 1 (reference)
      Yes 498 8 3,860.7 2.072 1.125 (0.560–2.258)
      Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma

      Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

      eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.

      Table 2. The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma and myomectomy

      Model 1: adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise. Model 2: adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index.

      Incidence per 1,000 person-years.

      Table 3. Subgroup analysis for the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of uterine leiomyoma

      Incidence per 1,000 person-years,

      Adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index.

      Sung JH, Kim KS, Han K, Park CY. Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Diabetes Metab J. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2023.0444. Epub ahead of print.
      Received: Dec 08, 2023; Accepted: Jun 17, 2024
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2023.0444.

      Diabetes Metab J : Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
      Close layer
      TOP