Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Primary Prevention in Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Ji Yoon Kim; Nam Hoon Kim

doi:10.4093/dmj.2022.0454

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Diabetes Metab J > Volume 47(1); 2023 > Article

Editorial Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Primary Prevention in Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Ji Yoon Kim, Nam Hoon Kim; Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2023;47(1):42-44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2022.0454
Published online: January 26, 2023

6,845 Views
174 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref
1 Scopus

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Nam Hoon Kim

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea E-mail: pourlife@korea.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

NOTES
REFERENCES
About this article

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1], requiring intensive strategies for cardiovascular risk management in affected patients. A linear relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and incident CVD has been observed in patients with DM, as well as in individuals without DM [2,3]. Lowering LDL-C levels with statin therapy is currently a mainstay of dyslipidemia management in people with DM [4-8]. Previous randomized controlled trials of statins such as the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) have shown that use of statins reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [9]. In the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, individuals with DM aged 40 to 75 years are included in four statin benefit groups, in which the cardiovascular benefits of statins clearly exceed the possible harms [10].

However, the level to which LDL-C should be lowered remains controversial, largely due to the limited number of treatto-target trials for statin and nonstatin therapies. Nonetheless, the concept of “the lower, the better” for LDL-C level is widely accepted based on clinical trials of high-intensity statins [11,12], ezetimibe [13], and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors [14,15]. These trials demonstrated that an LDL-C level less than 70 mg/dL was achievable with intensive management, resulting in a lower incidence of adverse cardiovascular events than that with higher levels of LDL-C using low- to moderate-intensity statins. Accordingly, the 2023 American Diabetes Association guideline recommends using high-intensity statins to reduce LDL-C levels by ≥50% of the baseline and to <70 mg/dL in patients with DM aged 40 to 75 years at high cardiovascular risk [4]. Similarly, the 2021 European Society of Cardiology recommends LDL-C level less than 70 mg/dL for patients with T2DM [5]. However, there is little evidence whether the same LDL-C target could be applied to Asians or Koreans. Most randomized controlled trials of statin or nonstatin therapies included a small number and proportion of Asians. In addition, some differences in the response to statin therapy have been observed between Europeans and Asians [16,17].

In this issue of Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, Moon et al. [18] provided important evidence of appropriate LDL-C level for cardiovascular health in Korean patients with T2DM. This study evaluated the incidence of CVD according to LDL-C level, type of comorbidity, and number of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with T2DM. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included 248,002 patients with T2DM without CVD. As a result, the risk of incident CVD increased linearly from an LDL-C level ≥70 mg/dL in most patients with T2DM, regardless of the type of comorbidities. The appropriate target LDL-C level could be considered <70 mg/dL when comorbidities are present and <100 mg/dL when the duration of DM is less than 5 years or if hypertension is absent. If patients have three or more cardiovascular risk factors, the target LDL-C level could be less than 55 mg/dL.

Nevertheless, as the authors discussed in their manuscript, the question remains whether this type of cohort study can provide a ‘target’ LDL-C level for cardiovascular risk reduction. LDL-C levels in this analysis were measured once in 2009, when the statin prescription rate was only 35.9% in patients with T2DM. The primary outcome was measured until 2018, but the changes in LDL-C levels and a new statin prescription during the follow-up period were not included. Considering the continuous increase in statin prescription rate over the past 10 years [19], the LDL-C levels among patients have probably decreased and the gaps between the individuals narrowed. In the context of a retrospective study, adjustments for the clinicians’ judgment regarding the prescription of lipid-lowering drugs could not be made. Therefore, an analysis focusing on statin users (Supplementary Table 2 in [18]) has great significance. The LDL-C level of statin users can be interpreted as the achieved LDL-C level, which more clearly presents the target LDL-C level. As a result, the appropriate level of LDL-C in statin users was considered to be <70 mg/dL, consistent with the primary analysis. Of note, adverse cardiovascular events occurred less frequently in statin users than in non-users even though they had the same LDL-C level, supporting the pleiotropic effects of statins beyond LDL-C lowering [20].

In individuals younger than 40 years, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events significantly increased only when the LDL-C level was greater than 190 mg/dL, suggesting a smaller effect of the LDL-C level on the development of CVD in younger patients than in older patients. However, as discussed by the authors, this may be due to the small number of cardiovascular events in this age group. Considering that the hazard ratios of primary outcomes in younger patients with higher LDL-C level were greater than those in older age groups, a larger-scale study may reveal a significant association between LDL-C level and development of CVD in younger patients with T2DM.

The conclusions of this study are as follows. For most patients with T2DM and comorbidities, the appropriate target LDL-C level can be less than 70 mg/dL. For patients without additional cardiovascular risk factors or those aged <40 or >75 years, the target LDL-C level could be less stringent. Considering that most clinical trials of lipid-lowering drugs included patients with established CVD [11-15], there was not sufficient data on optimal LDL-C level for primary prevention in people at risk of CVD. It is noteworthy that this study provides evidence for appropriate LDL-C levels for the primary prevention of CVD in Korean patients with T2DM.

NOTES

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;339:229-34.Article PubMed
2. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008;371:117-25.Article PubMed
3. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366:1267-78.Article PubMed
4. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023;46(Supplement_1):S140-57.
5. Visseren FL, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Back M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3227-337.PubMed
6. Hur KY, Moon MK, Park JS, Kim SK, Lee SH, Yun JS, et al. 2021 Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus of the Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:461-81.Article PubMed PMC PDF
7. Rhee EJ, Kim HC, Kim JH, Lee EY, Kim BJ, Kim EM, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in Korea. J Lipid Atheroscler 2019;8:78-131.Article PubMed PMC PDF
8. Yu J, Lee SH, Kim MK. Recent updates to clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2022;37:26-37.Article PubMed PMC PDF
9. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:685-96.Article PubMed
10. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45.
11. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1425-35.Article PubMed
12. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1495-504.Article PubMed
13. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2387-97.Article PubMed
14. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1713-22.Article PubMed
15. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2097-107.Article PubMed
16. Lee E, Ryan S, Birmingham B, Zalikowski J, March R, Ambrose H, et al. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in white and Asian subjects residing in the same environment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:330-41.Article PubMed
17. Nakamura H, Arakawa K, Itakura H, Kitabatake A, Goto Y, Toyota T, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:1155-63.Article PubMed
18. Moon MK, Noh J, Rhee EJ, Park SH, Kim HC, Kim BJ, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes according to comorbidities and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in Korean people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:45-58.Article PubMed PMC PDF
19. Cho SMJ, Lee H, Lee HH, Baek J, Heo JE, Joo HJ, et al. Dyslipidemia fact sheets in Korea 2020: an analysis of nationwide population-based data. J Lipid Atheroscler 2021;10:202-9.Article PubMed PMC PDF
20. Blum A, Shamburek R. The pleiotropic effects of statins on endothelial function, vascular inflammation, immunomodulation and thrombogenesis. Atherosclerosis 2009;203:325-30.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Sensing Biomechanical Alterations in Red Blood Cells of Type 1 Diabetes Patients: Potential Markers for Microvascular Complications
Riccardo Di Santo, Benedetta Niccolini, Alessandro Rizzi, Laura Bertini, Denise Pires Marafon, Maria Vaccaro, Federica Cristallo, Enrico Rosa, Linda Tartaglione, Laura Leo, Marco De Spirito, Gabriele Ciasca, Dario Pitocco
Biosensors.2024; 14(12): 587. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Primary Prevention in Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes Metab J. 2023;47(1):42-44. Published online January 26, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2022.0454

XML Download

Related articles

Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Primary Prevention in Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

About this article

Kim JY, Kim NH. Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Primary Prevention in Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2023;47(1):42-44.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2022.0454.

Download citation ↓