- Clinical Care/Education
- Frequency of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose during the School Day Is Associated with the Optimal Glycemic Control among Korean Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
-
Eun Young Joo, Ji-Eun Lee, Hee Sook Kang, Shin Goo Park, Yong Hee Hong, Young-Lim Shin, Min Sohn
-
Diabetes Metab J. 2018;42(6):480-487. Published online June 29, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0018
-
-
5,350
View
-
77
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFPubReader
- Background
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels among Korean adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Factors affecting the SMBG frequency were analyzed in order to improve their glycemic control. MethodsSixty-one adolescents aged 13 to 18 years with T1DM were included from one tertiary center. Clinical and biochemical variables were recorded. Factors associated with SMBG frequency were assessed using structured self-reported questionnaires. ResultsAverage total daily SMBG frequency was 3.8±2.1 and frequency during the school day was 1.3±1.2. The mean HbA1c level was 8.6%±1.4%. As the daily SMBG frequency increased, HbA1c levels declined (P=0.001). The adjusted odds of achieving the target HbA1c in participants who performed daily SMBG ≥5 significantly increased 9.87 folds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 61.70) compared with those performed SMBG four times a day. In the subjects whose SMBG frequency <1/day during the school day, an 80% reduction in the adjusted odds ratio 0.2 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86) showed compared to the group with performing two SMBG measurements in the school setting. The number of SMBG testing performed at school was significantly high for individuals assisted by their friends (P=0.031) and for those who did SMBG in the classrooms (P=0.039). ConclusionHigher SMBG frequency was significantly associated with lower HbA1c in Korean adolescents with T1DM. It would be necessary to establish the school environments that can facilitate adequate glycemic control, including frequent SMBG.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Problems of blood glucose self-monitoring in patients with diabetes mellitus
Yu. A. Kononova, V. B. Bregovskiy, A. Yu. Babenko Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council.2022; (21-1): 140. CrossRef - Adherence as a Predictor of Glycemic Control Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Using Real-world Evidence
Sohayla A. Ibrahim, Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Yaw B. Owusu, Maryam Al-Khaja, Amel Khalifa, Dalia Ahmed, Ahmed Awaisu Clinical Therapeutics.2022; 44(10): 1380. CrossRef - Self-Care IoT Platform for Diabetic Mellitus
Jai-Chang Park, Seongbeom Kim, Je-Hoon Lee Applied Sciences.2021; 11(5): 2006. CrossRef - Factors Associated with Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Among Young People with Type 1 Diabetes in China: A Cross-Sectional Study
Wencong Lv, Jiaxin Luo, Qing Long, Jundi Yang, Xin Wang, Jia Guo Patient Preference and Adherence.2021; Volume 15: 2809. CrossRef - Habits and Routines during Transitions among Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Kathleen M. Hanna, Jed R. Hansen Western Journal of Nursing Research.2020; 42(6): 446. CrossRef - How was the Diabetes Metabolism Journal added to MEDLINE?
Hye Jin Yoo Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 201. CrossRef - Differences of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System and Finger Pricks on Clinical Characteristics and Glucose Monitoring Satisfactions in Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pump
Ayman A Al Hayek, Asirvatham A Robert, Mohamed A Al Dawish Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
|